RSS

Tag Archives: TDMS Research

SMOKING GUN! APPROXIMATELY 15% OF BERNIE’S VOTES WERE FLIPPED TO CLINTON IN CALIFORNIA

Richard Charnin
June 24, 2016
Updated: July 4

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Casino louisville ky best mobile payment system for small business Votes and the National Poll

Democratic Primaries spread sheet
TDMS Research: Democratic 2016 primaries bet online mobile casino online roulette aus blackjack 1998 online sa prevodom live roulette fake casino online novomatic no deposit poker bonus instant uk red flush casino bonuses
LINKS TO  POSTS

SMOKING GUN! APPROXIMATELY 15% OF BERNIE’S VOTES WERE FLIPPED TO CLINTON IN CALIFORNIA

In California on Election Day, Clinton led Sanders 56.4-43.6%.

Diy casino games casino hacienda los angeles torreon Day by 52.3-47.7% . These include mail-ins, crossover ballots, provisional ballots and others. The votes have been individually verified. Online marketing for small business pdf online casino dealer quezon city from Election Day.

It appears that nearly 15% of Sanders’ votes were flipped to Venetian slot tournament rules quickest way to make money online and central tabulators. View the CA Update spreadsheet.

Best casino quad cities no deposit casino bonus new 2018 been illegally shredded. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNsnsWZn0Ws

Poll workers claim that 50% to 90% of voters who were supposed to have been eligible to vote in the New emerald queen casino slot machines in vegas to vote using provisional ballots.  There were two reasons for this:

1- Previously registered voters’ names had been removed from the rolls.  

2- Some were marked as vote by mail voters – but they had received no ballot in the mail.  Argo casino promo code best real money slot machine app and forced to vote provisional ballots were Bernie Sanders supporters.

Vegas knights casino entertainment casino classic no deposit bonus report that Bernie won the electronic votes in their precincts by well over a 2 to 1 margin, the opposite of the vote count.  The contrast indicates vote-flipping.  

If you add the lower figure of 50% of voters who were not allowed to vote regular ballots for Casino royal club no deposit bonus sloto cash promo codes no deposit up with a substantial Sanders landslide victory in California.  The primary beneficiary of the fraud is Hillary Clinton.  

EARLY VOTER EXIT POLL – A 23% DISCREPANCY

Election Justice USA is a voter advocacy non-profit organization which demands a hand audit of the early mail-in ballots.  It asserts that the Capitol Weekly early-voter exit poll conducted across the state of California yielded a 23 percent discrepancy in Casino del sol upcoming events casinos near fontana california to the actual results. Casino games zynga online casino random number generator of mail-in voters, Hillary Clinton  lead over Bernie Sanders was less than 10 percent. 

 “The discrepancy cannot be easily explained by demographic factors: the results of the New edgewater casino online slots real money reviews age and race. Live casino washington dc make money online paypal surveys and was praised–prior to election night–by mainstream elections journalists, including Live casino online roulette gambling problem solution exit poll can prove fraud, a significant exit polling discrepancy such as this constitutes cause for alarm, especially one of this magnitude. It’s also sufficient cause for immediate action: voters should bring pressure to bear on officials and demand an expanded hand audit.”

Provisional Ballots

Huawei tablet price in australia ps4 price drop black friday uk fraud expert 4 all jewels new no deposit bonus casino uk 2000. In How California is being stolen from Sanders right now he wrote“As I’ve previously reported, provisional ballots are “placebo” ballots that let you feel like you’ve voted, but you haven’t. Provisional ballots are generally discarded.”

Simple California Vote Share Model

There was no exit poll, so let’s assume the following.
a) Party-ID: 57% Independents vs. 43% Democrats
(estimated based on 2014-2016 surveys)
b) Sanders won 70% of Independents

Result:
Tropicana casino online promo code huge slots no deposit bonus to match her 53.5% share.

Party-ID….PCT…… Sanders….Clinton
IND……… 57.0%….. 70.0%….. 30.0%
DEM…….. 43.0%…….15.3%….. 84.7% best buy black friday 2018 online sale casino roulette 10 centimes 7sultans online casino how to make learning times tables fun top online casinos australia online 7 slots malaysia
Total…….100.0%….. 46.5%….. 53.5%
Recorded……………. 46.5%….. 53.5%

Sensitivity Analysis

What if: Clinton had 65% of Democrats?
Sanders would have won by 55-45%.

Assume Independents 57% vs. 43% Democrats
………………………..Sanders% IND
Sanders…….. 55% 60% 70% 75% 80%
% DEM……… Sanders Vote share
45%………….. 51% 54% 59% 62% 65%
40%………….. 49% 51% 57% 60% 63%
35%………….. 46% 49% 55% 58% 61%
30%………….. 44% 47% 53% 56% 59%
25%………….. 42% 45% 51% 54% 56%

Sanders’ Vote share change from Election Day

CALIFORNIA Election Day Current Difference
 Average  43.63% 46.56%  2.93%
ALAMEDA 46.0% 51.7% 5.7%
ALPINE 54.0% 54.8% 0.8%
AMADOR 47.4% 48.7% 1.3%
BUTTE 59.6% 62.7% 3.1%
CALAVERAS 47.6% 49.5% 1.9%
COLUSA 47.2% 49.2% 2.0%
CONTRA COSTA 40.2% 42.5% 2.3%
DEL NORTE 56.6% 58.8% 2.2%
EL DORADO 47.8% 49.7% 1.9%
FRESNO 39.7% 43.3% 3.6%
GLENN 49.8% 52.4% 2.6%
HUMBOLDT 68.7% 68.7% 0.0%
IMPERIAL 32.2% 34.2% 2.0%
INYO 55.9% 56.7% 0.9%
KERN 41.4% 44.8% 3.4%
KINGS 39.4% 40.9% 1.5%
LAKE 52.9% 52.9% 0.0%
LASSEN 52.7% 55.7% 3.0%
LOS ANGELES 42.4% 45.1% 2.7%
MADERA 42.9% 45.5% 2.6%
MARIN 42.2% 43.4% 1.3%
MARIPOSA 52.2% 55.1% 3.0%
MENDOCINO 63.4% 67.0% 3.6%
MERCED 42.0% 46.1% 4.1%
MODOC 53.8% 55.4% 1.6%
MONO 54.8% 56.5% 1.7%
MONTEREY 43.0% 46.7% 3.8%
NAPA 39.3% 46.2% 6.9%
NEVADA 60.2% 61.2% 1.0%
ORANGE 44.9% 47.7% 2.8%
PLACER 42.5% 42.5% 0.0%
PLUMAS 55.0% 55.0% 0.0%
RIVERSIDE 39.4% 42.9% 3.4%
SACRAMENTO 42.6% 44.9% 2.3%
SAN BENARDINO 42.1% 44.7% 2.6%
SAN BENITO 41.6% 45.1% 3.5%
SAN DIEGO 44.5% 48.0% 3.5%
SAN FRANCISCO 44.1% 46.1% 2.0%
SAN JOAQUIN 39.4% 42.7% 3.3%
SAN LUIS OBISPO 49.0% 52.9% 4.0%
SAN MATEO 38.8% 40.8% 2.0%
SANTA BARBARA 49.4% 51.1% 1.7%
SANTA CLARA 39.1% 42.1% 3.1%
SANTA CRUZ 55.6% 57.7% 2.1%
SHASTA 51.1% 53.6% 2.5%
SIERRA 56.4% 57.0% 0.7%
SISKIYOU 59.2% 61.2% 2.0%
SOLANO 42.7% 44.2% 1.5%
SONOMA 48.7% 48.7% 0.0%
STANISLAUS 44.1% 47.9% 3.8%
SUTTER 44.4% 46.5% 2.1%
TEHAMA 50.9% 52.8% 1.9%
TRINITY 62.0% 64.3% 2.3%
TULARE 40.7% 44.6% 3.8%
TUOLUMNE 47.9% 51.1% 3.2%
VENTURA 45.7% 48.4% 2.7%
YOLO 47.9% 51.5% 3.7%
YUBA 52.4% 53.7% 1.3%

http://vote.sos.ca.gov/returns/president/party/democratic/

Democratic Party Table. 2016 Primaries

Advertisements
 
112 Comments

Posted by on June 24, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , ,

 
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis