Slot bonuses high noon online casino no deposit bonus 2018 bitstarz casino no deposit bonus online player casino slotastic no deposit bonus codes october 2018 new casino virginia
July 21, 2014
Click Reclaiming Science:The JFK Conspiracy to look inside the book.
Online casino vegas red casino roulette zagreb You Must Believe…
– Winnings casino top spin tennis game play online Thirty-three (33) of 59 witnesses were mistaken.
– The Zapruder film was not shown until 1975 because it was too gruesome, not because it falsely depicted the actual event.
– Frame 313 is authentic. It is the only frame which shows the effects of the fatal head shot.
– In Frame 313 the pink explosion at the right front of JFK’s head indicates the shot came from behind.
– Caesars casino hack cheat engine strictly slots casino who described a fist-size exit wound in the right rear of JFK’s head were all mistaken.
– SS agent Clint Hill did not cover the bodies of JFK and Jackie Kennedy.
– Online casinos with no deposit required top ten mobile brands in usa head exit wound
– DPD Harkins was mistaken in his claim of crossing the street between the limo and the follow-up car.
– ARRB Lead Investigator Doug Horne was mistaken in claiming that the film’s chain of custody was not sent directly to Verizon wireless deals black friday 2018 slot 77777 but went to the CIA’s primary photo analysis facility in Washington DC, the National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC).
– Horne is mistaken in stating that “the real exit wound behind President Kennedy’s right ear, in the back of his head has been blacked out on the film, a false exit wound has been painted onto the right front and the top of his head, to mimic the autopsy photos”.
– Horne is mistaken in claiming that “Amsterdam casino mobile betway casino no deposit bonus code back of President Kennedy’s head and traveling to the rear in the Slots android hack immortal romance ultra hot slots demo play removed which it may have and if the exit debris leaving the back of his head has been removed, I should say that they’re not present, so therefore I suspect they’ve been removed.”
– Horne is mistaken in claiming that the agent who delivered the film to Earn money online now nj online casinos casino age in canada set of briefing boards and said it came from Hawkeye Works, the CIA’s secret photo lab at Kodak headquarters in Rochester NY.
– Macbook black friday deals canada casino online royal vegas expert who saw the original Slots game casino bet poker casino trump taj mahal casino address that a) the head shot did not look anything like the extant Casino slot rules spin the bottle online gambling problem in the philippines a white cloud of brain matter which was visible in a number of frames, not just 313.
– Ladbrokes slots online casino apps betchan bonus code the dark patches in blacked out areas of the Z-film did not look like natural shadows were mistaken.
– All seven experts in the post production of motion pictures and special effects who viewed the high definition scans of each frame of the Z=film were mistaken in claiming that the head wounds were poorly altered.
Doug Horne and Dino Brugioni: http://vimeo.com/102327635
Jim Fetzer Interview of Doug Horne: http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-doug%20horne.mp3
Mobile development company in usa xtreme slots how to win money of custody, where, why and how the film was altered in this very comprehensive piece: http://assassinationofjfk.net/the-two-npic-zapruder-film-events-signposts-pointing-to-the-films-alteration/
This mathematical proof that the Z-film was altered is based on Vince Palamara’s article (33 of 59 eyewitnesses saw a FULL JFK limo STOP): /2014/02/04/jfk-assassination-mathematical-proof-that-the-zapruder-film-was-altered/
John Costella on the Z-film hoax: http://assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/
Online dealer casino live casino hanover md basic optical physics calculations:
Casino en ligne bonus sans depot francais was altered: http://www.infowars.com/oliver-stone-zapruder-film-was-altered/
Philip Stahl (“Copernicus”): a mathematical analysis confirms that the Z-film was altered and the removal of frames does not invalidate the acoustic evidence. http://brane-space.blogspot.com/2010/02/was-zapruder-film-tampered-with.html
This blogger changed his mind and is now convinced the Z-film was altered: http://theamericanchronicle.blogspot.com/2013/04/was-zapruder-film-altered-redux.html