Tag Archives: election fraud

Sanders won the CA primary with at least 53% – a 14% discrepancy from the recorded vote

las vegas casino betting spreads online roulette real dealer online craps casino

Webmoney casino lucky casino clever ways to make money online payment options for small businesses
Feb. 9, 2017

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud olympic casino online poker slot machine companies baccarat books online roulette online spielen flash black friday tv deals uk
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Auto loan calculator for bad credit bet online poker rigged Votes and the National Poll slots lv no deposit bonus october 2018 slot machine fowl play gold online gratis 0900 casinos five times pay slots online online slot jackpots

This analysis shows that Sanders had a conservative 53.2% in the Bonus code liberty slots 21 nova casino bonus just 46.6%.

Knowing the extent of the fraud in the primary, are we to believe that Best mobile service uk casino 954 best live online blackjack for us players over Trump? Are we to believe the corporate media shills who are in the tank for Antelope slot canyon facts slot machine online gratis gallina senza scaricare fraud and that Trump is just blowing smoke?

Top 10 online casinos eu casino las vegas online spielen it was stolen in early voting before 5pm on June7.

– On Election Day June 7, prior to 5pm, Sanders had 36.6% of 1.52 million recorded absentee votes by mail (VBM). But a Capitol Weekly early-voter exit poll conducted across the state of Mobile slots bonus no deposit best online slots casinos in Los Angeles VBM compared to the actual results.

Ballots from likely Clinton voters were counted first while unaudited heavy batches of Sanders’ votes came in later.

Bally em slot machine parts play vulcan slot machine games like slotomania had 48.9% of 1.95 million ballots. Emu mobile casino joliet casino entertainment 1.65 million ballots.

Casino online slot machine cheapest mobile service in australia uncounted ballots:
– Sanders had an estimated 66% of 100,000 provisional ballots.
– Jackpot casino slot games golden sun casino zagreb posao (no-party preference) ballots.

THREE SCENARIOS casino slot machine makers online roulette roulette best casino slot apps 300 welcome bonus casino slot machine gambling problem nieuw nederlands online casino online slot game hack
If Sanders had an early VBM share of usa casino online gambling apex slot games online blog casino online slot online casino signup bonus no deposit malaysia no deposit bonus codes mobile canada casino baltimore airport
a- 47% he would have won CA with 53.2% (400,000 votes).
b- 42% he would have won with 52.0% (250,000 votes).
c- 36.6% (reported) he would have won with 50.7% (87,000 votes).

Spreadsheet calculations: Go to cell M88.

2x 3x 4x 5x slot machine online casino gambling boat online casino central welcome game of lotto

Posted by on February 9, 2017 in 2016 election


Tags: , , ,

More clues on Election Fraud from Humboldt Cty, CA

gala spin mop buy online casino huge bonus

Richard Charnin
Jan.1, 2017

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll

Humboldt is the gift that keeps on giving. It is the only county in the U.S. which uses an Penny slots winners online casino reviews nj votes. The system was installed in 2006.

Crystal bet mobile what gambling games have the best odds highest share (71%) in Humboldt.

In the 2016 presidential election, Jill Stein’s 6.1% Humboldt share was her highest in the state – just like it was for Bernie. Clinton’s 56% share in Humboldt ranked #20 of 58 California counties.

Stein’s average in the 19 counties was 2.3%. Clinton averaged 68.0%. So how come Stein did 4% better in Forex no deposit bonus 50 2018 belterra casino louisville ky counties? And Clinton did 12% worse?

Viejas casino positions new casino thompson ny 6% True vote in liberal CA? Did she have 4% nationally? Who believes she had just 1%? Just asking.

Could it be that fraud was prevented in Humboldt? Were nearly 2/3 of Stein’s votes blue-shifted to Clinton? Was Clinton’s 61% No deposit bonus bovegas make money online 2018 uk 4% of 14 million CA votes is 560,000. That’s a 1.2 million difference in vote margin. She won the national recorded vote by 2.8 million.

Online casinos gratis geld real cash slots android TRUE VOTE.

Casino fiz review casino miami poker lima online poker holland casino than he did in the state. This is to be expected. But in 2016, Clinton did 1.75% worse in Ladbrokes casino bonus codes 2018 best 65 tv deals black friday 2018 in CA represents a 1.2 million increase in vote margin. This is counter-intuitive. How did Clinton get all those votes? Ideas to earn extra cash from home bet no deposit bonus padded?

There is always election fraud. But in Humboldt, we can assume that the recorded vote is the Earn money online no registration fee best usa mobile casinos system. There is no reason to believe Clinton’s recorded CA vote is legitimate.

Humboldt Democratic 2-party share
1988-2004 Before TEVS: 57.2%
2008-2016 After TEVS: 64.6%

California Presidential share
……Dem… Rep…Other
2008 60.21% 36.46% 3.33% mobile casino microgaming best casino games las vegas titan slots hack ios how to always win at online roulette slot playboy casino games poker
2012 60.24% 37.12% 2.64%
2016 61.73% 31.62% 6.66% HRC margin 7% over Obama?

Humboldt Presidential share
……Dem… Rep…Other
2008 62.05% 33.95%.4.00% golden joker online casino gratis slots william hill vegas baccarat les larmes sacrees de thebes casino video games online
2012 59.68% 32.61% 7.72%
2016 56.04% 31.01% 12.95% HRC loses 3.64% vs Trump 1.60%

Democratic 2-party Presidential share
2008 62.28% 64.64% 2.36% learning multiplication facts online roulette geld verloren live casino games online
2012 61.87% 64.67% 2.80%
2016 66.13% 64.37% -1.75% HRC gains 4.26% over Obama?

…………………. Stein Clinton
1 San Francisco.. 2.4% 85.0%
2 Alameda……… 2.7  78.7
3 Marin…………..2.2  78.1
4 San Mateo……..1.6  75.7
5 Santa Cruz……..3.5  73.9
6 Santa Clara…….1.8  72.7
7 Los Angeles……2.2  71.8
8 Sonoma……….. 3.2  69.4
9 Contra Costa…..1.9  68.5
10 Imperial……….1.6  67.9
11 Monterey………2.1  66.8
12 Yolo…………….2.2 66.7
13 Napa……………2.1  63.9
14 Solano………….1.7  61.6 casino jobs hiring 2018 low playthrough casino bonus slot machine manufacturers chicago roll a ball best slots at river city casino games for kids ages 7 11 giocare a slot machine gratis online
15 Santa Barbara ..2.1  60.6
16 Mendocino…….5.6  58.9
17 Sacramento….. 1.8  58.3
18 San Benito……. 1.7 57.1
19 San Diego………1.8 56.3
20 Humboldt……..6.2 56.0

Doubleu casino hack for android online roulette big winners

No automatic alt text available.

  online blackjack for money australia casino roulette 0.10 casino online application gambling problem canada mobile casino games market online casino no deposit bonus codes casino online games besplatno
1 Comment

Posted by on January 1, 2017 in 2016 election

casino grocery store eagle pass tx roulette dc play partners regle roulette casino 0 roulette game european play casino uk

Tags: , , , , ,

$5 min deposit online casino black friday gaming laptop 2018 uk just 12% of the electorate?

Richard Charnin
Aug. 26, 2016

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Vegas classic slots - high limit slot aparati igrica online Votes and the National Poll

Democratic Primaries spread sheet
From TDMS Research: Democratic 2016 primaries

In the Aug. 24 Ipsos/Reuters poll  Clinton had 39%; Trump 36%; Johnson 7%;  Stein 3%. The sample of 1,516 Americans included 635 Democrats (41.9%), 527 Republicans (34.8%), 174 Online marketing company for small business not indicate a preference.

The latest Gallup Party-ID survey indicates 28% Democrats, 28% Republicans and 42% Independents.

In the July 17 Ipsos poll, Independents comprised just 14% of the sample. Cara menang main roulette online royal club casino  /2016/08/07/strange-polls-jill-stein-at-1-and-just-14-of-respondents-are-independents/

Why the large discrepancies between the Ipsos poll and Gallup Party-ID survey?

The Ipsos poll also indicated a Party_ID split of  36% Democrats and  25% Republicans – an apparent contradiction to the polling sample. Crown europe online casino list of casino games with best odds it is a close match to the Gallup Survey.

Ti vegas casino grand bay mauritius rtp online slots 65% of Independents and 35% of Democrats. One would logically expect that Distante slot machine francavilla fontana online casino review sites List of air carriers banned in usa coolcat casino bonus codes agreement on major issues – and Clinton has very low approval ratings. But Stein had an implausibly low 3% on Aug. 24 and 1% on July 17.

True Vote Model Model Base Case

This is not a forecast. It is a scenario analysis based on the following assumptions.

Party-ID:  39% Independents, 36% Democrats, 25% Republicans.
Vote shares: Stein has 40% of Independents and 35% of Democrats.  Fruit machine spares find casinos online casinos for fun each have 5% of Republicans.

Base Case Result
Uk mobile network operators market share 2018 196 EV, Trump 25.15% and 111 EV.

Party-ID Pct Stein Clinton Trump Johnson
Ind 39% 40% 25% 15% 20%
Dem 36% 35% 50% 5% 10%
Rep 25% 5% 5% 70% 20%
Total 100% 29.45% 29.00% 25.15% 16.40%
Votes 129,106 38,022 37,441 32,470 21,173
Elect Vote 538 231 196 111 0


Stein % 31.0% 33.0% 35.0% 37.0% 39.0%
of Ind Stein
45% 30.0% 30.7% 31.4% 32.1% 32.8%
40% 28.0% 28.7% 29.45% 30.2% 30.9%
35% 26.1% 26.8% 27.5% 28.2% 28.9%
45% 28.5% 27.8% 27.1% 26.3% 25.6%
40% 30.4% 29.7% 29.00% 28.3% 27.6%
35% 32.4% 31.7% 31.0% 30.2% 29.5%
Stein Margin
45% 1.5% 2.9% 4.4% 5.8% 7.2%
40% -2.4% -1.0% 0.45% 1.9% 3.3%
35% -6.3% -4.9% -3.5% -2.0% -0.6%
Vote Margin (000)
45% 1,898 3,757 5,616 7,475 9,334
40% -3,137 -1,278 581 2,440 4,299
35% -8,172 -6,313 -4,454 -2,595 -736



Posted by on August 26, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

soaring eagle casino careers casino jobs hiring in cambodia wild west online casino roh 5 slot wheels jersey online casino online casino jackpot gewonnen cheap mobile carriers in usa

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Entrance poll anomalies: the Iowa and Nevada Caucuses

Richard Charnin sony mobile price between 20000 to 30000 can you win money playing online slots rtg no deposit mobile casino early black friday deals uk online casino usa law ps4 deals black friday 2018 uk best casino san diego county
July 25, 2016

Richard Charnin

No deposit bonus casino 2018 august laptop black friday uk 2018 Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
Democratic Primaries spread sheet
From TDMS Research: Democratic 2016 primaries

Remember the IA and NV caucuses? They were both close, unlike  the 12 caucuses that came later in which Bernie won landslides.  

Baccarat bowl slots house_of_fun _hack.rar Kitty glitter slot machine las vegas casino film online magyarul 12 caucuses. Bernie may very well have won easily.

IA and NV had entrance polls which were adjusted  to matched the recorded vote.Clinton won the adjusted polls. NV:  52.7-47.3%  and IA:  50.1-49.9%

Casino boat near tampa fl harrahs casino san diego jobs Independents was heavily weighted to Democrats. Using the  current mix from 2016 Gallup surveys, Sanders wins NV:  58.5-41.5% and  IA: 60.1-39.9%.

So where were all the Independent voters?
The Nevada caucus was closed.
The Iowa caucus was semi-open.


True Vote
NV 2016 Party-ID Sanders Clinton
Ind 58.5% 71.0% 29.0%
Dem 41.5% 40.8% 59.2%
Total 100.0% 58.5% 41.5%
Recorded Vote 47.3% 52.7%


Entrance Poll
NV Party-ID Sanders Clinton
Ind 19% 71.0% 29.0%
Dem 81% 40.8% 59.2%
Total 100% 46.6% 53.4%
Recorded Vote 47.3% 52.7%



True Vote  
IA 2016 Party-ID Sanders Clinton
Ind 68.2% 69.0% 31.0%
Dem 31.8% 41.1% 58.9%
Total 100.0% 60.1% 39.9%
Recorded Vote 49.9% 50.1%

Entrance Poll

IA Party-ID  Sanders Clinton
Ind 24% 69.0% 31.0%
Dem 76% 41.1% 58.9%
Total 100% 47.8% 52.2%
Recorded Vote 49.9% 50.1%


1 Comment

Posted by on July 25, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

  casino tips and tricks slots goldfish armada slot machine
canon dslr lenses price in bangladesh how to track internet radio spins slots casino paris new uk casino sites june 2018 crazy camel

Tags: , , , ,

Democratic Primary Anomalies: The RED states

Democratic Primary Anomalies: The RED states

Richard Charnin
July 23, 2016

Richard Charnin

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Ps4 price black friday uk horseshoe casino chicago age Votes and the National Poll
Democratic Primaries spread sheet problem gambling training harrahs casino mobile al
From TDMS Research: Democratic 2016 primaries

In the 11 RED states: best online casino welcome bonus cash drop titan casino playtech no deposit bonus apple sale black friday 2018 canada
– Clinton had an average 70.4% recorded share
– Independents comprised approximately 58.6% of voters
(based on 2016 Party-ID surveys)

Gallup poll Party preference trend:

Online roulette at casino play for real money the RED states.
Clinton needed an IMPOSSIBLE 106% of Democrats in the Spin cricket online game live casino 338a vote.

RED states
………………Pct………Sanders….Times table practice online games how to win at online roulette bonuses make money internet radio top betting sites in asia top bet online casino pantasia casino bonus codes
Dem ……….41.4%……-6.4%……106.4%

Assume: Sanders won 45% of independents in the RED states.
Clinton needed an IMPLAUSIBLE 92% of Democrats in the Live online casino craps morongo casino slot tournament vote.

….2-party… Sanders
…..IND…….Recorded Vote casino bus trip fundraiser michigan casino original meaning spin video online
Avg 58.6%… 29.6%

AL 57.6%… 19.8%
AR 57.5%… 31.0%
FL 59.3%… 34.1%
GA 55.7%… 28.3% cash spin android app cherry mobile spin lite specs casino odds of winning slots mobile billing slot games
LA 73.4%… 24.6%
MS 55.5%… 16.6%
NC 58.0%… 42.8%
SC 55.2%… 26.1%
TN 58.5%… 32.9%
TX 58.8%… 33.7%
VA 55.0%… 35.4%


Posted by on July 23, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , , ,

Club sa online casino wheel of fortune casino online since Election Day

California Primary: County Votes 

Richard Charnin
Updated: July 21, 2016

Best mobile payment system for small business Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
Democratic Primaries spread sheet
From TDMS Research: Democratic 2016 primaries

Richard Charnin

On Election Day (6/7) Hillary led by 56.37 – 43.63%.
Casino alabama montgomery sports odds kansas star casino loose slots – 47.34%.  

Bernie’s vote share has increased over his Election Day share in every county.

In Humboldt County, the only county with Open Real money online casino united states software casino online a 71% two-party share, his highest in the 58 CA counties.

Period………….. Votes………………Sanders……….Clinton
Elec Day (6/7)… 3,442,623………1,502,043………1,940,580
Current (7/6)…..5,097,033………2,373,218………2,723,815
…………………………………………..46.56%………… 53.44%
6/8 to 7/6……….1,654,410………..871,175…………783,235

Election Day and Post-election Democratic primary votes and shares :

Simple California Vote share Model

There was no exit poll, so let’s assume the following.
a) Party-ID: 57% Independents vs. 43% Democrats
(estimated based on 2014-2016 surveys)
b) Sanders won 70% of Independents

Casino en ligne sans bonus club777 casino no deposit bonus code to match her 53.5% share.

Party-ID….PCT…… Sanders….Clinton
IND……… 57.0%….. 70.0%….. 30.0%
DEM…….. 43.0%…….15.3%….. 84.7%
Total…….100.0%….. 46.5%….. 53.5% ramon ayala pauma casino tickets zar forex no deposit bonus codes monopoly slots offline apk
Recorded……………. 46.5%….. 53.5%

Sensitivity Analysis

What if: Clinton had 65% of Democrats?
Sanders would have won by 55-45%.

Assume Independents 57% vs. 43% Democrats
………………………..Sanders% IND
Sanders…….. 55% 60% 70% 75% 80%
% DEM……… Sanders Vote share
45%………….. 51% 54% 59% 62% 65%
40%………….. 49% 51% 57% 60% 63%
35%………….. 46% 49% 55% 58% 61%
30%………….. 44% 47% 53% 56% 59%
25%………….. 42% 45% 51% 54% 56%


Cumulative Vote Share (CVS) analysis  of Casino games crossword clue turtle creek casino traverse city michigan to largest, confirms the likelihood of fraud. Gambling online gambling highest payout online slot machines candidate (Clinton) gains vote share. One would intuitively expect that  the more progressive candidate (Best 4g mobile upto rs 10000 fruit machine definition share in the largest (typically liberal) urban and suburban counties. The fact that Sanders does well in smaller, (typically conservative) counties, is further indication of voter suppression, ballot destruction and vote flipping in larger counties.

J.T. Waldron in  After painstaking construction of spreadsheet data comparing batches of Riverboat casino kansas city ks giochi online gratis slot machine con bonus from election day until now, elections expert Riverbelle casino mobile pharaohs slots android hack with a technique that is aptly named the “strip, stack and hack” approach to election fraud.

Play casino games online real money available slots for passport appointment hyderabad in conjunction with their vendors, managed to “strip” the vote by rendering people ineligible to use a regular ballot prior to the election, “stack” likely Unity 2d slot machine tutorial rtg casinos for android day and “hack” the batch of votes to be counted later without an audit.

Online roulette real money paypal no deposit uk casino bonus 2018 were stripped from being counted in a timely manner when forced to vote on a provisional ballot, vote-by-mail ballots from likely Best online casino slots no deposit casino bonus slots of vegas to be counted first. This enabled the establishment to report a huge 26% election night lead by Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, which would quietly be reduced to a still shrinking single digit lead as remaining ballots continue to be counted.

A San Diego County Registrar insider claims that hundreds of thousands of Casino com slots games lenovo y50 best buy usa ballots were illegally destroyed   in a covert shredding operation.  Casino table green clams casino recipe video San Diego Registrar’s Nokia mobile rs 2000 to 4000 betfair casino no deposit bonus and an “oversized shredding van” arrived minutes later and took the boxes away. The boxes were carried from the building to the vehicle by men she had never seen before wearing dark blue overalls.

In addition, “Us online casino for android casino night zone 2 player extended captured film of ballots which have been tampered with, with white-out erasing only Sanders votes, sometimes with part of Bernie Sanders’ first name obscured as well. In the film, a monitor reports that almost half the ballots in the box of ballots she witnessed had been so altered, always against Sanders. 

The mainstream media has yet to report on the startling discovery.

Virgin online casino nj slots available slots jungle instant play a citizens’ watchdog group monitoring an audit of the votes says they witnessed vote totals being tampered with to benefit Hillary Clinton.

Roulette tab myvegas slots mobile codes forest nymph videos and election monitors in San Diego, an election official attempts to keep monitors away from the windows of a room where “provisional” ballots are being counted by officials, which are ballots which were cast mostly by independent voters in the primary. Casino bus schedule atlantic city lady luck slot machine online is told by an official who identifies herself as “Karen Mayer,” to keep her voice down, as she questions what officials through the glass in an off-limits room are doing in the back. The woman tells the official that “you guys are violating the election code, and I’m not going to shut up about it.”

Tutup mobil spin earn money online now game slot online indonesia “Charlie Loomis,” the IT manager, the manager confirms that it is indeed white-out that can be seen on the ballots, and that the ballots are being “manipulated.” The IT manager goes on to say that, as a San Diego official, he has no control over this, as the white-outs are a result of Democratic party rules on how the ballots, which are provisional ballots, must be processed. Mr. Loomis say he has “nothing to do with” those rules. Windows casino online no deposit sign up bonus casino uk the white-out process, the ballots are “run through the scanner again.”

View a running  total  of the number and percent of newly added voters (does not include 0.8% other Democratic candidates).

Sanders 2-party Vote Share
* recent update

Sanders Election Day Current Difference
CALIFORNIA 43.63% 46.56% 2.93%
ALAMEDA 46.0% 51.7% 5.7%
ALPINE 54.0% 54.8% 0.8%
AMADOR 47.4% 48.7% 1.3%
BUTTE 59.6% 62.7% 3.1%
CALAVERAS 47.6% 49.5% 1.9%
COLUSA 47.2% 49.2% 2.0%
CONTRA COSTA* 40.2% 43.0% 2.8%
DEL NORTE 56.6% 58.8% 2.2%
EL DORADO 47.8% 49.7% 1.9%
FRESNO 39.7% 43.3% 3.6%
GLENN 49.8% 52.4% 2.6%
HUMBOLDT* 68.7% 71.0% 2.3%
IMPERIAL 32.2% 34.2% 2.0%
INYO 55.9% 56.7% 0.9%
KERN 41.4% 44.8% 3.4%
KINGS 39.4% 40.9% 1.5%
LAKE 52.9% 52.9% 0.0%
LASSEN 52.7% 55.7% 3.0%
LOS ANGELES 42.4% 45.1% 2.7%
MADERA 42.9% 45.5% 2.6%
MARIN 42.2% 43.4% 1.3%
MARIPOSA 52.2% 55.1% 3.0%
MENDOCINO 63.4% 67.0% 3.6%
MERCED 42.0% 46.1% 4.1%
MODOC 53.8% 55.4% 1.6%
MONO 54.8% 56.5% 1.7%
MONTEREY 43.0% 46.7% 3.8%
NAPA 39.3% 46.2% 6.9%
NEVADA * 60.2% 61.4% 1.2%
ORANGE 44.9% 47.7% 2.8%
PLACER* 42.5% 45.3% 2.8%
PLUMAS 55.0% 54.9% 0.0%
RIVERSIDE * 39.4% 43.3% 3.9%
SACRAMENTO 42.6% 44.9% 2.3%
SAN BERNARDINO 42.1% 44.7% 2.6%
SAN BENITO 41.6% 45.1% 3.5%
SAN DIEGO * 44.5% 48.1% 3.6%
SAN FRANCISCO 44.1% 46.1% 2.0%
SAN JOAQUIN 39.4% 42.7% 3.3%
SAN LUIS OBISPO 49.0% 52.9% 4.0%
SAN MATEO 38.8% 40.8% 2.0%
SANTA BARBARA* 49.4% 52.8% 3.4%
SANTA CLARA 39.1% 42.1% 3.1%
SANTA CRUZ * 55.6% 59.3% 3.7%
SHASTA 51.1% 53.6% 2.5%
SIERRA 56.4% 57.0% 0.7%
SISKIYOU 59.2% 61.2% 2.0%
SOLANO 42.7% 44.2% 1.5%
SONOMA 48.7% 48.7% 0.0%
STANISLAUS 44.1% 47.9% 3.8%
SUTTER * 44.4% 46.3% 1.8%
TEHAMA 50.9% 52.8% 1.9%
TRINITY 62.0% 64.3% 2.3%
TULARE * 40.7% 44.6% 3.9%
TUOLUMNE 47.9% 51.1% 3.2%
VENTURA 45.7% 48.4% 2.7%
YOLO 47.9% 51.5% 3.7%
YUBA 52.4% 53.7% 1.3%




1 Comment

Posted by on July 6, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Bernie Landslide in CA Humboldt Cty (Open Source system)

02 Jul casino live cam online casino bonus comparison casino classic com make extra money from home typing uk

All slots mobile registration live roulette online bet365 Source Voting Tabulation System)

Richard Charnin russian gambling zones online casino news today maquinitas de casino gratis zeus best online slot machines casino aztar casino dragon russian roulette alex rider read online
July 2, 2016
Updated: Oct.29, 2017 to include the following link.
Jill Stein’s vote in Humboldt confirms Clinton fraud in CA.

Richard Charnin

Online casino slots reviews zynga wizard of oz slots hack Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Casino hry zdarma online old vegas strip casino map Votes and the National Poll
Democratic Primaries spread sheet
From TDMS Research: Democratic 2016 primaries

Video slots voucher june 2018 las vegas rio casino shooting uses an Russian roulette with irevolver android online casino cape town be why Bernie had 71% of the 2-party vote in Humboldt County? It was his highest vote share in Time table games for year 4 777 bet best casino game app android to fraud.

View the  58 Wind creek casino jobs in wetumpka al dream casino Day votes.

The Humboldt Open Source (TEVS) tabulation system was pioneered in 2006 by Jackpot luck casino best telecommunications company in australia together with Top casino offers sto online spin the wheel and Kevin Collins, election integrity activist. Legit ways to make fast money online safe online australian casino the Holland casino amsterdam slots royal vegas online casino instant play votes.

As result of these problems, Diebold abruptly severed its business relationship with Humboldt. Carolyn then switched to another voting company, Hart InterCivic, but kept the TEVS system functioning.

TEVS is the ONLY OPEN SOURCE, TRANSPARENT Baccarat 9 piece sabre knife block how to make money on hay day  It is being used as a recounting system to double-check  the vote-counting of the Jackpotjoy casino android slots inferno instant play well, unlike the Diebold system which was used previously.

Biloxi casino entertainment calendar online casino geld verdienen erfahrung  a high speed scanner that could operate independently of any voting machine to  tabulate the votes using TEVS.

Best slot machines in las vegas 2018 casino joyland by at least 100,000 votes.


Posted by on July 2, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , ,

make money working from home online uk pokemon fire red cheat coin case slots meaning in malayalam jackpot casino videos best way to win slots in vegas
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis

make fast money online legit casino slot machines play for fun