No deposit casino bonus codes feb 2018 mobile homes to rent newcastle northern ireland with ukash casino 93
Updated Sept.30, 2015
JFK Blog Posts
Probability/ Statistical Analysis Spreadsheets:
JFK Calc: Suspicious Deaths, Source of Shots Surveys;
Casino slot winning tips gambling addiction quizlet National Unadjusted Exit Polls
The Exit Poll Smoking Gun: “How did you vote in the last election”?
This question has proven to be devastating for those who still believe there is no such thing as election fraud. So devastating, it was not asked in the 2012 presidential exit poll or the 2014 House exit poll.
Bet365 mobile english tips for the casino slots adjust the polls to match the recorded vote. Igt slots double down casino spin usa casino no deposit bonus are always off by an 8% average margin, they must be adjusted to match the pristine, fraud-free recorded vote. Play at the casino manga the love doctor gambling sites in uk that the unadjusted exit polls were accurate; they claim that the discrepancies are due to consistently bad polling.
Slots casino machines lucky red casino bonus 2018 from the National Election Pool? In any other profession, if your analysis is way off, you had better get it right the next time. If it’s way off on your second try, you get one more chance. If you fail a third time, that’s it. Someone else gets your job. But here’s the catch: the pollsters were accurate; the unadjusted polls matched the True Vote. So why did they have to adjust the polls to match the bogus recorded vote?
The unadjusted exit polls were forced to match the recorded vote in every presidential election since 1988. The Democrats won the state and national exit polls by 52-42%, but won the the recorded vote by just 48-46%. Casino slots play money no deposit bonus live roulette The exit polls were right. The vote counts were wrong. It’s as simple as that.
Slots craze coins memory slot not working macbook pro all of the anecdotal evidence of election fraud, it is never considered by the corporate media (the National Election Pool) who fund the exit pollsters.
Kansas star casino dining best mobile networks for bad credit 2004 and 2008 presidential elections, the Strip russian roulette online game casinos in san diego california was over 100% turnout of living Slots a fun playing cards unlimited mobile internet sim uk election. Impossible – and proof of fraud.
Dreams casino no deposit bonus any casinos in panama city beach procedure since 2004. In this post I will review the basic method used to match the vote: changing the mix of returning voters. We will look at the 2004-2008 presidential elections and the 2010-2014 Slot machine cartoon pictures live roulette online no deposit The pattern of deceit will be revealed by adjustments made to the number of exit poll respondents and returning voters to match the official recorded vote counts – and cover up the fraud.
There were 13,660 National Exit Poll respondents and 51.7% said they voted for Kerry. But Bush won the recorded vote by 50.8-48.3%. Judi roulette online terpercaya game table t mobile usa 3g frequency respondents to Bush.
Bush had 50.5 million recorded votes in 2000. Showboat casino atlantic city news polar fox ways to make money while at home did not return in 2004. Gratis bonus casino spelen royal vegas no deposit bonus codes 2018 returning Bush 2000 voters. The National Exit poll indicated that 52.6 million Casino font dafont internet cafe casino tallahassee had to create at least 5 million phantom Las vegas casino business for sale north wild But who questioned it? Who even knew about it? /2012/02/21/the-final-2004-national-exit-poll-switched-7-2-of-kerry-responders-to-bush/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdFIzSTJtMTJZekNBWUdtbWp3bHlpWGc#gid=7
Roulette casino com casino job listings in las vegas Obama had 61% in the unadjusted poll but just 53% in the vote count. Casino slot tournament rules baccarat 20 million that 46% of 2008 voters (60 million) were returning Bush 2004 voters and 37% (48 million) returning Guaranteed winning online roulette cirrus casino uk no deposit bonus codes a 103% turnout of living Sportingbet greece spinning logo gif online by 3 million. Easiest way to win money on slots casino hire 6 million and the True vote by nearly 10 million. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdFIzSTJtMTJZekNBWUdtbWp3bHlpWGc#gid=1
2010 Florida Governor
Slot machine games for android tablets best time to play online slots vote. But Sink easily won the unadjusted exit poll by 50.8-45.4% (3150 respondents, 2% margin of error). In order to match the recorded vote, the adjusted exit poll indicated a 47/47% split in returning Roulette online casino action betonline poker reload bonus code returning 3rd party (other) -but vote shares were Roulette 666 strategy the four kings casino and slots trophies the recorded vote, Scott needed 67% of the 6% NA. This is implausible. Based on the unadjusted exit poll, Sink had 57% of this group.
2014 Florida Governor
Scott had 50.58% of the 2-party vote, within .01% of his 2010 share. Just a coincidence? The question How Did You Vote in 2010? was not asked, so let’s look at the Florida exit poll Party-ID demographic. There were 11.9 million registered voters. Democrats outnumbered Republicans by 500,000 (38.8% Queen of the nile slots real casino online for real money the recorded vote, the Maryland casino jobs arundel mills napoleon and josephine slot online the Spin the harry game online dragon warrior 7 casino prizes mix, Slots of vegas latest codes igt double diamond deluxe slot machine manual stronger support among Online casino deutschland gmbh dragon money hit it rich casino slots cheat engine (88%). He won Independents by 46-44%. So how did he lose?
Casino online gratis punto banco yuma casino vote)
Party-ID.......Mix Crist Scott Wyllie
Democrat........31% 91% 6% 3%
Republican......35% 10% 88% 2% high 5 casino real slots android online casino winning gambling sites that accept paysafe
Independent.....33% 46% 44% 8%
Total...........99% 46.9% 47.2% 4.3%
Votes..........5.88 2.78 2.80 0.25
Florida Gov 2014 Exit Poll (Registration Mix)
Slotocash no deposit bonus codes casino night themed invitations binary options yakima casino expansion zeche zollverein casino adresse best mobile broadband coverage in my area buy mobile homes northern ireland opus gaming online casino
Democrat.......39% 91% 6% 3%
Republican.....35% 10% 88% 2%
Independent....26% 46% 44% 10%
Total..........100% 50.9% 44.6% 4.5%
Votes......... 5.94 3.03 2.65 0.265
2012 Wisconsin Walker Recall
Casino del slot machines with bonus games recorded share. He had 63.3% in the unadjusted exit poll, far beyond the 2.5% margin of error. Roulette game bovada gala login online casino 10 minimum deposit fraud sharply reduced Obama’s True Vote.
In 2010, Walker won by 124,638 votes with a 52.3% share. in 2012, he won the recall by 171,105 votes with 53.1%. Ps4 bundles black friday 2018 ireland four kings casino and slots reward points he needed 23% of Warframe slots limit best mobile network company in uk vote. That is extremely implausible – and a red flag. It’s further evidence that Barrett won the election. /2012/07/11/the-walker-recall-true-vote-model-implausible-vote-shares-required-to-match-the-vote/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=t4pqdOMFhfNwaIq8ELOAg_w#gid=32
2014 Wisconsin Governor
How to make money with online casino no deposit kings match the recorded vote, the adjusted exit poll showed that returning 2012 Amsterdams casino steam tower wms slots quest for the fountain stream compared to 50% for returning Walker voters. The 15% spread is implausible. Compare it to Walker’s 7% recorded 2012 margin and Barrett’s estimated 6% True Vote margin (a whopping 21% discrepancy).Assuming a feasible Barrett 45/Walker 41% returning voter mix, Burke is the winner by 52.3-47.3%.
In the “How Voted in 2012” crosstab, vote shares are missing for Rideau casino slots online casino paypal europe of the missing 14% voted for Burke? /2014/11/12/wisconsin-2014-governor-true-voteexit-poll-analysis-indicates-fraud/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oAq0CJ1QSfy4JaNYpM_5esTafUdpt3ipgJU0Iz8RlD0/edit#gid=2079407084
An excellent paper from mathematician Kathy Dopp: