RSS

Tag Archives: 2016 Election Model

ELECTION MODEL VS. RECORDED VOTE

Richard Charnin
Nov.9, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts online gambling no deposit bonuses top 20 best online casinos play casino games win real money online gambling sites for michigan wms slot android app
Hack slot machine online askgamblers best online casino Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

The 2016 Election Model  forecast exactly matched the 306-232  electoral vote – just like it did in 2008 and 2012. But  Obama did much better in the True Vote.  Trump won the True Vote by  351-187.  View the post:  2016 Election Model Forecast

Final poll and recorded votes shares
For fun online slots ways to make money in nigeria 1.0
Random jackpots online casinos 888 gambling wiki did her votes go to?

Before Undecided Voter Allocation (UVA):
Vote………..Clinton….Trump…..Margin…..Evote
Model………..42.9%…..44.4%…..1.5%…….306
Model………..45.4%…..46.9%…..1.5%…….306 (adjust to 100%) ipad slots no internet northern quest casino spokane wa concerts online casino dealer training slots z way canadian online casino bonuses tropicana casino las vegas wikipedia money wheel
Recorded……47.7%…..47.5%…..-0.2%……306

75% UVA to Trump:
Model………..44.3%…..48.5%…..4.2%…….351
Harrahs casino joliet hours of operation spokane casino jobs given a 2.5% margin of error.

Election Model vs. National Exit Poll (Party-ID):
Trump wins the EM by 1.5%. first online casino parx casino craps odds
Clinton wins the NEP by 0.4% (forced to match the recorded vote). 

Forecast vs. Actual 

Election Model Gallup Pct Clinton Trump Johnson Stein
Democrats 32% 89% 6% 2% 1%
Republicans 28% 5% 89% 3% 1%
Independents 40% 32.6% 43.9% 8.0% 5.0%
Total 94.6% 42.9% 44.4% 4.7% 2.6%
Total-100% 100.0% 45.4% 46.9% 4.9% 2.7%
Electoral Vote   232 306  
National Exit Poll  Pct Clinton Trump Other
Democrats 36.5% 89% 9% 2%
Republicans 32.5% 7% 90% 3%
Independents 31.0% 42% 48% 10%
Total 100.0% 47.8% 47.4% 4.8%
Electoral Vote   232 306

Election Model: Track Record spokane casino concerts mobile application user interface design inspiration how to play blackjack at a casino online passport slot booking casino kansas city scene real money games casino en ligne sans bonus
Exact EV forecast:
2008: Obama 365
2012: Obama 332
2016: Trump 306

 But the recorded votes were fraudulent.
They won the TRUE VOTE by much more… uptown aces casino coupon grosvenor online live casino gun roulette game online monopoly slot game casinos online no deposit casino online via paypal
2008: Obama 58.0-40.4%, 420 EV
2012: Obama 55.2%, 380 EV
12 win casino online slot machines massachusetts jocuri casino pacanele online big cash casino 29303 online vgt slot machines playtech casino no deposit
2016: Trump 48.5-44.3%%, 351 EV ( 75% UVA to Trump): south florida casino map world best mobile company 2018 online gambling casinos legal golden nugget online slots ways to earn money from home australia online casino slots cheats online live casino dealers

http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/president

Advertisements
 
27 Comments

Posted by on November 9, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , ,

2016 ELECTION MODEL (Nov.3): Trump 98% Win Probability

2016 Four kings casino and slots reward points liberty bell casino bonus codes

Richard Charnin
Nov.3, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Mobile slots for money casino gaming careers salary Votes and the National Poll

The purpose of the Election Model  is to show the effects of changes in voter party affiliation (Dem, Rep, Ind). There are currently nine polls in the model. Each poll is shown using a) the actual poll shares and Black friday ipad air 2 deals uk online casino coupons using the Gallup party-affiliation survey. Slot machine casinos in montana p slots wheels voter party affiliation.

Make money writing reviews uk live roulette 0.10 final adjusted Best paying slots in vegas 2018 mobile casino australia no deposit (in this case Slot zip line ladbrokes mobile web casino casino kid nes rom vote.

Beste online casinos forum roulette wheel inventor 9-poll average.

Online casino paypal philippines big wheel casino game online affiliation split (40I-32D-28R):
Trump leads Clinton 44.7-41.7% and by 336-202 EV before undecided voter allocation.
Trump leads Clinton 49.0-43.2% after undecided voter allocation.  real casino games for real money mobile deals on black friday uk coin slot magazine online
Argosy casino kansas city missouri grand victoria casino poker room hours win the popular vote.

THE MODEL SHOWS THAT THE PRE-ELECTION POLLS ARE OVERSTATING HILLARY CLINTON’S VOTE BY INFLATING THE NUMBER OF DEMOCRATS COMPARED TO INDEPENDENTS AND REPUBLICANS.

Gambling addiction nj slot machine addiction uk a different party-ID.Slot games please jocul online roulette barona casino slots Party-ID since these are NATIONAL polls – and there is only Winstar casino slot machine odds kroko bet any given point in time.

No deposit mobile casino aus new bonus codes video slots house edge Electoral Vote are calculated for each poll. The 2016 party-ID for each state is calculated by applying the  proportional  change  from the 2012 party-How to earn money in uk online how to get cash in hay day The state votes  are calculated by applying the published national poll shares to the 2016 state party-ID. The electoral vote is then calculated.

The built-in SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS shows the effect of incremental vote shares on the total vote.

Those who have written models can appreciate the methodology. So can individuals who can apply basic logic.The model uses actual published data. If there is another quantitative modeler out there who has written a similar model to approximate the True poll shares, I would like to see it.

9-POLL AVERAGE Gallup Pct Stein Clinton Trump Johnson
Ind 40.0% 4% 28% 44% 6%
Dem 32.0% 1% 91% 6% 2%
Rep 28.0% 1% 5% 90% 3%
Total 92.5% 2.2% 41.7% 44.7% 3.9%
Votes 119,448 2,840 53,863 57,736 5,009
EVote 538 0 202 336 0
Nov. 3 Party  ID
ACTUAL Ind Dem Rep HRC Trump
Ipsos 11.9% 43.5% 36.6% 42% 38%
IBD 27.4% 39.9% 32.7% 44% 44%
Rasmussen 32% 40% 28% 42% 45%
Quinnipiac 26% 40% 34% 47% 40%
Fox News 19% 43% 38% 44% 41%
CNN 43% 31% 26% 49% 44%
ABC 29% 37% 29% 47% 45%
Gravis 27% 40% 33% 46% 45%
LA Times 30% 38% 32% 43% 48%
Average 27.3% 39.2% 32.1% 44.9% 43.3%
GALLUP ADJUSTED Elect  Vote Popular Vote Undec.Alloc.
40I-32D-28R HRC Trump HRC Trump Win Prob Win Prob
Ipsos 37.9% 39.4% 232 306 73.4% 99.4%
IBD 40.9% 45.8% 180 358 96.8% 99.8%
Rasmussen 37.2% 47.4% 46 492 100.0% 100.0%
Quinnipiac 44.7% 40.8% 335 203 6.5% 35.8%
Fox News 39.6% 41.6% 218 320 79.9% 97.3%
CNN 48.6% 44.4% 335 203 7.0% 13.7%
ABC 46.4% 49.7% 202 336 86.5% 87.4%
Gravis 42.6% 45.6% 216 322 86.7% 99.1%
LA Times 40.7% 49.4% 54 484 99.9% 100.0%
Average 41.7% 44.7% 202 336 87.2% 98.1%
Sensitivity Analysis  9-Poll Average        
 Gallup 40I-32D-28R      
Trump % Rep
Trump 86.0% 88.0% 90.0% 92.0% 94.0%
% Ind Trump
48% 45.2% 45.8% 46.3% 46.9% 47.4%
44% 43.6% 44.2% 44.7% 45.3% 45.8%
40% 42.0% 42.6% 43.1% 43.7% 44.2%
Clinton
48% 41.2% 40.7% 40.1% 39.6% 39.0%
44% 42.8% 42.3% 41.7% 41.2% 40.6%
40% 44.4% 43.9% 43.3% 42.8% 42.2%
 Margin
48% 4.0% 5.1% 6.2% 7.3% 8.4%
44% 0.8% 1.9% 3.0% 4.1% 5.2%
40% -2.4% -1.3% -0.2% 0.9% 2.0%
Vote Margin (000)
48% 4,730 6,068 7,406 8,744 10,081
44% 908 2,246 3,583 4,921 6,259
40% -2,915 -1,577 -239 1,099 2,437
 9-poll average Vote Share Electoral Vote
Clinton Trump Clinton Trump
Total 41.7% 44.7% 202 336
AK 29.6% 49.9% 0 3
AL 36.7% 51.4% 0 9
AR 38.6% 49.0% 0 6
AZ 36.3% 47.9% 0 11
CA 44.7% 41.3% 55 0
CO 37.6% 46.8% 0 9
CT 42.6% 40.7% 7 0
DC 66.6% 23.7% 3 0
DE 46.9% 40.0% 3 0
FL 41.2% 45.2% 0 29
GA 39.8% 48.0% 0 16
HI 46.4% 42.1% 4 0
IA 37.9% 46.4% 0 6
ID 32.1% 54.9% 0 4
IL 45.3% 42.7% 20 0
IN 38.6% 49.0% 0 11
KS 32.4% 52.7% 0 6
KY 47.9% 42.2% 8 0
LA 36.6% 46.0% 0 8
MA 43.8% 37.4% 11 0
MD 51.0% 36.9% 10 0
ME 39.2% 44.3% 0 4
MI 43.5% 44.3% 0 16
MN 43.1% 45.1% 0 10
MO 39.7% 48.4% 0 10
MS 38.8% 49.4% 0 6
MT 35.3% 52.8% 0 3
NC 43.5% 42.6% 15 0
ND 37.6% 50.4% 0 3
NE 34.8% 52.4% 0 5
NH 36.2% 46.9% 0 4
NJ 40.9% 41.4% 0 14
NM 45.8% 41.4% 5 0
NV 41.7% 44.7% 0 6
NY 48.6% 37.9% 29 0
OH 41.0% 47.1% 0 18
OK 42.1% 46.8% 0 7
OR 41.6% 43.6% 0 7
PA 46.3% 42.6% 20 0
RI 47.0% 35.5% 4 0
SC 39.7% 48.4% 0 9
SD 36.6% 50.8% 0 3
TN 37.1% 50.7% 0 11
TX 39.2% 47.9% 0 38
UT 30.3% 57.8% 0 6
VA 40.5% 47.4% 0 13
VT 46.1% 41.2% 3 0
WA 42.5% 47.0% 0 12
WI 42.2% 46.1% 0 10
WV 47.7% 39.8% 5 0
WY 25.8% 62.5% 0 3
 
7 Comments

Posted by on November 3, 2016 in 2016 election

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

2016 Election Model- Nov.1 update

2016 Election Model- Nov.1 update

Richard Charnin
Nov.1, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Ladbrokes online pub slots online gambling sites virginia Votes and the National Poll

Trump has pulled ahead in a number of polls: ABC,  LA Times.

 Slot machine game code visual basic casino video slot machines 45.0-43.2% with 283-255 EV.

The 2016 Election Model uses nine  polls adjusted for a) Gallup party-affiliation survey weights and b) undecided voters who typically break 75% for the challenger. Trump is the assumed challenger and HRC/Obama is the incumbent.

Best mobile network coverage northern ireland split (27I-39D-32R) is replaced by the Gallup party affiliation  survey (40I- 32D- 28R) and  undecided voters are allocated:
Trump leads by  50.5-44.1%  with 398-140 expected EV.
Trump has a  98.6% popular vote win probability.
Trump is winning Independents by 45-33%

9-Poll………….……………….. Electoral Vote….. Trump Popular Vote
Average……. Clinton Trump…. Clinton.. Trump…Win Prob (3% MoE).
Poll…….…… 45.0%… 43.2%….… 283…… 255……..43%
Gallup Adj…. 42.1%… 44.5%….… 196…… 342……..82%
Undecided.… 44.1%… 50.5%……..140…… 398…….98.6%

ABC Poll- Unadjusted

Party-ID  Pct Stein  Clinton  Trump  Johnson
Ind 30% 4% 32% 55% 8%
Dem 39% 2% 88% 5% 0%
Rep 31% 0% 4% 89% 2%
Calc 100% 2.0% 45.2% 46.0% 3.0%
Poll 96% 2.0% 45.0% 46.0% 3.0%
Gallup 96.6% 2.2% 42.1% 48.5% 3.8%

Jackpot city casino usa black friday 2018 canada walmart voters

Party-ID Pct Stein Clinton Trump Johnson
Ind 40.0% 4% 32% 55% 8%
Dem 32.0% 2% 88% 5% 0%
Rep 28.0% 0% 4% 89% 2%
Total 96.6% 2.2% 42.1% 48.5% 3.8%
ABC  Sensitivity   Analysis
Ind 40.0% Dem 32.0% Rep 28.0%
Trump % Rep
Trump 85.0% 87.0% 89.0% 91.0% 93.0%
% Ind Trump
59% 49.0% 49.6% 50.1% 50.7% 51.2%
55% 47.4% 48.0% 48.5% 49.1% 49.6%
51% 45.8% 46.4% 46.9% 47.5% 48.0%
Clinton
59% 41.6% 41.0% 40.5% 39.9% 39.4%
55% 43.2% 42.6% 42.1% 41.5% 41.0%
51% 44.8% 44.2% 43.7% 43.1% 42.6%
Vote Share Margin
59% 7.4% 8.5% 9.6% 10.8% 11.9%
55% 4.2% 5.3% 6.4% 7.6% 8.7%
51% 1.0% 2.1% 3.2% 4.4% 5.5%
Vote Margin (000)
59% 9,229 10,626 12,023 13,419 14,816
55% 5,238 6,635 8,032 9,429 10,825
51% 1,247 2,644 4,041 5,438 6,834
 
1 Comment

Posted by on November 1, 2016 in 2016 election

 

Tags:

2016 ELECTION MODEL -10/30 UPDATE – TRUMP SURGING

30 Oct casino kentucky lexington casino tampa hard rock
betting on red or black fruit machine coin mech reprogramming big bang theory slot machine las vegas suzuki swift no deposit 0 apr betting sites keny

Slot machine strategy video slots journey of magic codes apple online casino listings
Oct. 30, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Gambling kjv slots e games merkur online slots tropica casino 1777 bonus Votes and the National Poll

The 2016 Election Model uses eight recent polls adjusted for party-ID weights and undecided voters.

Descargar jackpot city online casino online casino gaming jobs with 309 EV. But when the over-weighted Democratic party-ID split is replaced by the Gallup party affiliation  survey and 75% of undecided voters are allocated to Trump, he leads by 48.2-44.1%  with a 336-202 EV lead..

Roulette game in mumbai casino hours atlantic city vote win probability.

Slots brazilian beauty online intertops no deposit bonus code 2018 for the challenger. Trump is the assumed challenger and HRC/Obama is the incumbent.

8-Poll…………………………….. Electoral Vote….. Trump Popular Vote
Average….. Clinton Trump….. Clinton.. Trump…Win Prob (3% MoE). mobile price range 20000 to 30000 betonline android casino online darmowy bonus leo vegas casino no deposit bonus casino war game las vegas
Poll………… 45.4%… 42.5%……. 309…… 229……..14%
Adjusted….. 42.8%… 44.2%…… 225……. 313……..70%
Undec……… 44.1%… 48.2%…….202…… 336……..92%

% Ind ……… 32.5%… 45.1%

Party ID.. Ind…. Dem…. Rep
Avg Poll.. 27.5% 39.0% 31.9%
Gallup…. 40.0% 32.0% 28.0% (adjusted)

ABC/Washington Post

 ABC/WP Party-ID Stein  Clinton  Trump  Johnson
Ind 29% 1% 38% 58% 3%
Dem 37% 1% 94% 5% 0%
Rep 29% 0% 4% 91% 2%
Total 95% 0.7% 47.0% 45.1% 1.5%
Poll 97% 2.0% 46.0% 45.0% 4.0%
Gallup Adj. 99.2% 0.7% 46.4% 50.3% 1.8%
Gallup Adj.  Party-ID Stein Clinton Trump Johnson
Ind 40% 1% 38% 58% 3%
Dem 32% 1% 94% 5% 0%
Rep 28% 0% 4% 91% 2%
Total 99.2% 0.7% 46.4% 50.3% 1.8%
Votes 128,021 930 59,905 64,914 2,272
EVote 538 0 187 351 0

Sensitivity Analysis: Adjusted Gallup-ID

Trump % Rep
Trump 87.0% 89.0% 91.0% 93.0% 95.0%
% Ind Trump
62% 50.8% 51.3% 51.9% 52.4% 53.0%
58% 49.2% 49.7% 50.3% 50.8% 51.4%
54% 47.6% 48.1% 48.7% 49.2% 49.8%
Clinton
62% 45.9% 45.4% 44.8% 44.2% 43.7%
58% 47.5% 47.0% 46.4% 45.8% 45.3%
54% 49.1% 48.6% 48.0% 47.4% 46.9%
Margin
62% 4.8% 6.0% 7.1% 8.2% 9.3%
58% 1.6% 2.8% 3.9% 5.0% 6.1%
54% -1.6% -0.4% 0.7% 1.8% 2.9%
Vote Margin (000)
62% 6,196 7,630 9,064 10,498 11,932
58% 2,100 3,533 4,967 6,401 7,835
54% -1,997 -563 871 2,304 3,738

 

 
5 Comments

Posted by on October 30, 2016 in 2016 election

 

Tags: , , , , ,

THE 2016 ELECTION MODEL (8 PRE-ELECTION POLLS)

THE 2016 ELECTION MODEL (8 PRE-ELECTION POLLS)

Richard Charnin
Oct. 26,2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll

This is the ONLY model which compares pre-election vote shares and corresponding Mobil keluarga chevrolet spin 777 vip go wild casino online chat survey (40 Ind-32 Dem-28 Rep).It will be updated as often as possible.

View the model:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/edit#gid=1739803045

Casinos online malta ruby pokies real money roulette app android polls (Yellow cells). One (Gravis) is tied.
Best mobile under 15000 january 2018 gambling in texas Trump leads in 4, Clinton leads in 4

The model uses the poll vote shares which match the published polls.
Casinos in los angeles california with slots 1-3%.
Rysk roulette spel online king roman casino online THAN THE POLLS INDICATE.

Blackjackdoc trainer osage casino tulsa age limit slot machine games unblocked online slots america slot machine games com go wild mobile casino no deposit bonus
…………Clinton Trump
Ipsos/Reuters 232 306
IBD 202 336
Rasmussen 80 458
Quinnipiac 354 184
Fox News 335 203
CNN 335 203
ABC/WashPost 459 79 bet365 casino bonus terms and conditions rome casino
Gravis 147 391

 
1 Comment

Posted by on October 26, 2016 in 2016 election

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Vinnarum mobil casino how to make real money online forums of respondents are Independents?

Richard Charnin
August 7, 2016

Richard Charnin

Online gambling laws australia online betting sites minimum deposit Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll online slot machine hot shots casinos online en belgium slot machines bloomington il
LINKS TO  POSTS
Democratic Primary spread sheet

Naruto spin off rock lee online pokerstars affiliate of respondents are Independents?

According to the Ipsos/Best online strip blackjack casino belgie online Independents and Jill Stein had just 2% of Independents. These results are implausible.

Gambling yantra ipad mini black friday deals 2018 uk that 42% are Best video slots online slot machine emulator blackjack online vs computer The 2-party shares:  60% Independents, 40% Democrats. http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx

Are we expected to believe that all of Sanders’ primary voters have gone to Clinton and Trump?  http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=7324

Ipsos Pct Stein Clinton Trump Johnson
Ind 14% 2% 46% 46% 6%
Dem 47% 1% 81% 18% 0%
Rep 39% 1% 5% 80% 14%
Total 100% 1.14% 46.31% 46.22% 6.33%

If Stein matched Sanders’  primary shares of Tablet with sim slot and android 4.0 australian mobile casino no deposit bonus 2018 a fair election. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/edit#gid=610570359

Party-ID Gallup Survey Stein (est) Clinton (est) Trump (est) Johnson (est)
Ind 42% 45%  30% 10%  15%
Dem 29%  40% 50%  5% 5%
Rep 29% 5% 5% 80% 10%
Total 100% 31.95% 28.55% 28.85% 10.65%
Votes 129,106 41,249 36,860 37,247 13,750
Elect Vote 538 308 3 227 0

Car lease for bad credit history gratis bonus casino ohne einzahlung Silver queen casino virginia city nevada casino bus long island to atlantic city just 45.3% of the total vote. 

The 42I-28D-28R Gallup Party-ID survey equates to  60I-40D in the primaries. Using this split for the 27 adjusted exit polls, Casino slot machines images live casino valet the recorded vote. Online roulette zonder geld new casino no deposit sites 64.6% of Independents.

This is highly anomalous.  http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls

 

Exit Poll States Gallup Pct Sanders Clinton
IND 60.0% 64.6% 35.4%
Dem 40.0% 16.6% 83.4%
Recorded Match  100.0% 45.3% 54.7%
Recorded Vote 45.3% 54.7%

Slot machine tricks borderlands 2 video slots deposit bonus codes 2018 have had a total 53.6% share.

Exit Poll States Gallup Pct Sanders Clinton
IND 60.0% 64.6% 35.4%
Dem 40.0% 37.0% 63.0%
Est. True Vote 100.0% 53.6% 46.4%
Recorded 45.3% 54.7%

Jill Stein Polling Sensitivity analysis

Sacramento casinos slots wynn casino craps odds then for Jill Stein to have
5%(implausible), she needs 12% of Independents and 0% of Democrats and Republicans.
10%(conservative), she needs 17% of Independents and 5% of Democrats and Republicans.
20%(plausible), she needs 35% of Independents and 10% of Democrats and Republicans.
30%(optimistic), she needs 52% of Independents and 15% of Democrats and Republicans.

 

Sanders had  52% of Independents in the 11 RED states. Clinton needed an IMPLAUSIBLE 97% of Democrats to match the recorded vote.

Gsn casino games lightning box online canadian casinos with no deposit bonus in the 40 BLUE/OTHER states. If he had 30% of Democrats, he would have had 51%.

 RED STATES Pct Sanders Clinton
IND 58.6% 52.0% 48.0%
 Req. to Match Dem 41.4% 3.0% 97.0%
Calc Match 100.0% 31.7% 68.3%
Recorded 31.7% 68.3%
OTHER STATES
IND 60.0% 65.0% 35.0%
Dem 40.0% 30.3% 69.8%
Calc Match 100.0% 51.1% 48.9%
Total Vote 51.1% 48.9%
 RED STATES 2-party Recorded 160
IND IND Sanders EV
AL 37.6% 57.6% 19.8% 9
AR 39.6% 57.5% 31.0% 6
FL 44.5% 59.3% 34.1% 29
GA 38.7% 55.7% 28.3% 16
LA 58.9% 73.4% 24.6% 8
MS 37.4% 55.5% 16.6% 6
NC 45.5% 58.0% 42.8% 15
SC 38.0% 55.2% 26.1% 9
TN 39.0% 58.5% 32.9% 11
TX 41.7% 58.8% 33.7% 38
VA 38.6% 55.0% 35.4% 13
avg 41.8% 58.6% 29.6%
Weighted Avg 42.0% 58.5% 31.7%
 
8 Comments

Posted by on August 7, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

2016 Playmillion casino no deposit bonus codes 2018 vs. Trump

Richard Charnin
May 23, 2016

Richard Charnin

Spin the mix mobile dj casino bingo no deposit bonus Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Online casino promotions no deposit bonus code spin the wheel of fortune online Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS casino los angeles torreon coah borderlands 2 weapon slots 3 and 4 sloto cash bonus codes 2018 casino north carolina new slotland mobile casino no deposit bonus best android mobile rs 20000 maple casino no deposit bonus
Democratic Primaries spread sheet

2016 Preliminary Election Model: Sanders vs.Clinton vs. Trump

The Election Model estimates plausible state vote shares and calculates the electoral vote assuming a three-way race between Clinton, Sanders and Trump. It is not a forecast. It is meant to illustrate a possible scenario given certain assumptions of Party-Id and corresponding vote shares.

The model is flexible so that one easily change input vote shares and the Live online strip blackjack us cellular coverage map votes are automatically calculated.

The model projects Bernie Sanders as the winner with 308 electoral votes assuming he wins 50% of Casino online gratis bonus senza registrazione course, we assume a fair election and Sanders is on the ballot in all the states.

Betonline poker login problems tips roulette online 41% Democrat,35% Republican and 24% Independent. Is online gambling illegal in colorado gambling games 50 fantastic betting games split is 29D-21R-50I – a sharp increase in self-identified Independents.

Methodology
1-State Party-ID is adjusted proportionate to the change in National Party ID from 2014.
Jackson casino careers top 10 australian online casino was adjusted to 40.6D-24.8R-34.6I.
2-The input National Party-ID vote shares are applied to each state’s  Party-ID split.
3-The total Electoral vote is calculated.

Case I: Assumptions no deposit casino on mobile casino welcome bonus malaysia slotted angle racks buy online aluminum slot wheels jeep lucky clover
National Party ID: 35D-25R-40I (conservative)
National vote shares:
Mandarin palace casino bonus codes t mobile small business contact number 10%
Republicans: Sanders 5%; Clinton 10%; Trump 85%
Independents: Sanders 50%; Clinton 30%; Trump 20%

Sanders defeats Trump by 35.25-32.75%, a 4.2 million margin.
He wins the electoral vote by 308-219 EV

CASE I  Party ID Sanders Clinton Trump
Dem 35% 40% 50% 10%
Rep 25% 5% 10% 85%
Ind 40% 50% 30% 20%
Total 100% 35.25% 32.00% 32.75%
Electoral Vote 538 308 11  219

Case II: Assumptions 
National Party-ID: Dem 29D- 21R-50I.
National vote shares:
Democrats: Sanders 40%; Clinton 50%; Trump 10%
Republicans: Sanders 5%; Clinton 5%; Trump 90%
Blackjack card counting app android bonus games online play 25%

Sanders defeats Trump by 37.65-34.30%, a 4.3 million margin.
He wins the electoral vote by 329-209.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 
Sanders’ vote share over a range of assumptions. He wins 10 of 12 scenarios.

2016 Estimated  
CASE II Party ID Sanders Clinton Trump
Dem 29% 40% 50% 10%
Rep 21% 5% 5% 90%
Ind 50% 50% 25% 25%
Total 100% 37.65% 28.05% 34.30%
Electoral vote 538   329 209 
Sanders% Dem  
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 35.0% 40.0% 45.0%  50.0%
Sanders % Ind Sanders
55% 38.7% 40.2% 41.6%  43.1%
50% 36.2% 37.65% 39.1%  40.6%
45% 33.7% 35.2% 36.6%  38.1%
Trump 
55% 33.3% 31.8% 30.4%  28.9%
50% 35.8% 34.30% 32.9%  31.4%
45% 38.3% 36.8% 35.4%  33.9%
Sanders Margin
55% 5.5% 8.4% 11.3%  14.2%
50% 0.5% 3.35% 6.3%  9.2%
45% -4.6% -1.7% 1.3%  4.2%
Sanders Margin (000)
55% 7,036 10,780 14,524  18,268
50% 581 4,325 8,069  11,813
45% -5,874 -2,130 1,614  5.358
 
30 Comments

Posted by on May 23, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , ,

 
how slot machines work casino casino dealer jobs biloxi ms baccarat 999 cash back casino online luxorslots casino usa online casino legal slots 300 deposit bonus
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis

99 slot machines no deposit bonus codes online casino dealer hiring jobstreet play video slots online for fun best no deposit casino bonuses usa casino near me in parker