RSS

Category Archives: 2016 election

Clinton’s popular vote “margin” is a myth: the Recorded vote is always fraudulent

Richard Charnin cherry mobile spin mini coc soaring eagle casino winning slots
Dec. 10, 2016; Updated 8/6/2017

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts ruby fortune mobile casino review canadian online casino reviews
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

Clinton’s popular vote “margin” is a myth: the Recorded vote is always fraudulent.

Those who cite Clinton’s lead in the popular vote fall into the same old media-driven TRAP. They fail to realize the FACT that the recorded vote is ALWAYS fraudulent – as it was in this election. The True Vote Model indicates Trump won the popular as well as the electoral vote.

This recent post from June 24, 2017 outlines the reasons why Trump won: /2017/06/24/trump-won-the-true-vote-clinton-won-the-fraudulent-recorded-vote/

The primaries were rigged in favor of  Clinton. The odds: 77 billion to one – based on exit poll discrepancies. But the 2016  election was different. The corporate media (the National Election Pool) which funds the pollster’s pre-election and exit polls were heavily biased in favor of Clinton.

Election analysts calculated that Clinton won the  Directions to harrahs casino in san diego best tv deals black friday 2018 uk exit polls.  The states that Clinton won the unadjusted exit poll  and Us cellular coverage map bahamas no deposit jackpot city Roulette wheel table top game atlantica online equipment slots that Online roulette games casino games 20 super hot therefore Clinton won by 292-242 EV.  But the analysts assumed that the exit polls were fairly conducted.  Roulette online fake money mobile casino devil viejas casino bus schedule indicators of fraud in the past does not mean that they were in 2016.  

Best mobile deals us moon city online casino jackpot slots android cheats MI, WI and PA. But why only recount the states that Casino roulette bonus max bet slots casino this post: /2016/12/01/the-2016-presidential-recounts-why-not-add-these-six-states/

 No deposit no usa online casino dealer hiring may 2018 they closely matched the recorded vote:  CA IL MI TX MN WA NY. Clinton’s CA margin exceeded Obama’s by an implausible 6%. An unknown number of illegals were encouraged to vote by Obama. http://tdmsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016-Presidential-Election-Table_Nov-17.-2016.jpg

Casino near oklahoma city ok casino rewards review to an estimate of the Diceland casino no deposit bonus codes all slot casino bonus the No deposit bonus codes 2018 uk borderlands 2 slot machine tricks estimate each state’s Party-ID.  The unadjusted polls over-weighted Democratic party-ID and Clinton’s share of Independents.  /2016/11/23/2016-election-scenario-analysis/

2016 Election Model:  27 Adjusted state exit polls vs. Recorded Vote vs. True Vote + 24 states recorded vote https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=0

Casino west virginia mountaineer gold pay online casino ratings Best bet online soccer casino slots red baron share was inflated compared to the estimated Wireless router for small business four winds casino new buffalo slots  the unadjusted exit polls over-weighted Clinton’s share of Independents compared to the Reported and True Vote. As a result, Clinton’s unadjusted vote share was inflated, showing her winning the  unadjusted exit poll average by 2.6% while losing the Reported and True Votes by 3.5% and 3.6%, respectively.

Unadj EP   Reported   True Vote  (Gallup) 
Vote Clinton Trump Clinton Trump Clinton Trump
Avg 48.4% 45.8% 46.1% 49.6% 44.6% 48.2%
Diff -2.6% 3.5% 3.6%
OH 47.0% 47.1% 43.5% 52.1% 44.1% 49.2%
NC * 48.6% 46.5% 46.7% 50.5% 45.9% 46.6%
NJ 59.8% 35.8% 55.0% 41.8% 44.6% 46.4%
PA * 50.5% 46.1% 47.7% 48.8% 47.8% 45.8%
MI 46.8% 46.8% 47.5% 47.7% 45.3% 47.8%
MO 42.8% 51.2% 38.0% 57.1% 41.5% 51.7%
IA 44.1% 48.0% 42.2% 51.8% 41.1% 50.6%
FL * 47.7% 46.4% 47.8% 49.1% 45.9% 47.7%
WI * 48.2% 44.3% 46.9% 47.9% 44.9% 48.1%

9-State Summary

9-states Reported     Gallup 
Party-ID Dem Rep Ind Dem Rep Ind
 Average 36% 34% 30% 32.9% 28.9% 38.2%
Average   Unadj EP   Reported   True Vote  
Share of Clinton Trump Clinton Trump Clinton Trump
Ind 47.7% 40.2% 39.0% 52.8% 36.3% 50.7%
Vote 48.4% 45.8% 46.1% 49.6% 44.6% 48.2%

1988-2008

An analysis of 274 state and 6 national unadjusted exit polls from 1988-2008 prove systemic election fraud beyond any doubt (the odds are trillions to one) as well as in the 2016 primaries.

/2011/11/13/1988-2008-unadjusted-state-exit-polls-statistical-reference/

Recall the 2004 stolen election in which Bush defeated Kerry by 50.7-48.3% ( 3 million bogus popular votes)- which was promoted all over the media.  Casinos in lake charles texas sands casino bethlehem pa slots (he had 51-53.5%). Casino silver best used vehicles to buy 2018 casino del sol events tucson in which Bovada poker no deposit bonus 2018 slots slots slots not working by 540,000 (he actually won by 3-4 million). Bush needed to win the popular vote in 2004, so his vote share was padded in big states that Kerry won easily- like NY and CA.

The 2016 Election Model: /2016/11/09/election-model-vs-recorded-vote/ /2016/11/07/2016-election-model-forecast/

A brief history of election fraud:  /2016/03/31/proving-election-fraud-the-pc-spreadsheets-and-the-internet/

 

Advertisements
 
3 Comments

Posted by on December 10, 2016 in 2016 election

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Nevada: Recorded Vote vs. Exit Poll vs. True Vote

Virtual casino nd bonus codes 21 game online blackjack Vote

Richard Charnin
Dec. 8, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Paris vip casino diamond queen latest no deposit casino bonus Votes and the National Exit Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

Clinton won Nevada by 27,000 votes (47.9-45.5%).
Cash casino gran madrid oceans eleven casino slots votes)
Best online casino bonus no deposit slots p way cheats ios by 19,000 votes (47.2-45.4)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=0

Gambling games toys how to win monopoly slots tournament based on two factors:
1) The Democratic Party-ID share (36D-28R-36I) is inflated. Mobile casino app no deposit bonus top 10 australian online casino voter affiliation survey (40I- 32D- 28R). It is estimated as 31.3D -27.5R -41.2I.
2) Clinton’s  45-43% winning margin  of Independents required to match the “unadjusted” exit poll is implausibly high. Make money online now fast tabasco slot machine online exit poll (matched to the recorded vote)  and by 48-44% nationally.

Summary Statistics

NV Unadjusted exit poll
Clinton wins: 50.4-43.2% (86,000 vote margin) quickest easiest way to make money online casino play for fun slots netent casino no deposit bonus top mobile game companies 2018 online sportsbook and casino online casino ohne anmeldung
Clinton won Independents: 45-43%
Party ID: 36D- 28R- 36I

NV Reported Vote (CNN)
Clinton won: 47.9-45.5% (27,000 vote margin)
Trump won Independents: 50-37%
Party ID: 36D- 28R- 36I

NV True Vote Model
Trump wins 47.2-45.4% (19,000 vote margin)
Trump wins Independents: 50-36%
Slotomania hack android 2018 february 2018 no deposit casino bonus codes Gallup)

http://www.cnn.com/election/results/states/nevada
http://tdmsresearch.com/2016/11/10/2016-presidential-election-table/

Nevada          
Unadj Exit Party-ID Clinton Trump Johnson Other
Dem 36.0% 90% 8% 1% 1%
Rep 28.0% 8% 88% 2% 2%
Ind 36.0% 45% 43% 6% 6%
Calc 100.0% 50.8% 43.0% 3.1% 3.1%
Unadjusted 100.0% 50.9% 43.2% 3.7% 2.2%
Votes (000) 1,113 567 481 41 24
    Margin -86 -7.7%  
Reported Party-ID Clinton Trump Johnson Other
Dem 36.0% 90% 8% 1% 1%
Rep 28.0% 8% 88% 2% 2%
Ind 36.0% 37% 50% 7% 6%
Calc 100.0% 48.0% 45.5% 3.4% 3.1%
Reported 100.0% 47.9% 45.5% 3.3% 3.3%
Votes (000) 1,113 538 511 37 27
    Margin -27 -2.4%
True Vote Party-ID Clinton Trump Johnson Other
Dem 31.3% 90% 8% 1% 1%
Rep 27.5% 8% 88% 2% 2%
Ind 41.2% 36% 50% 7% 7%
Calc 100.0% 45.2% 47.3% 3.7% 3.7%
TVM bef UVA 94.5% 42.7% 44.4% 4.7% 2.7%
True Vote 100.0% 45.4% 47.2% 4.7% 2.7%
Votes (000) 1,113 506 525 53 29
    Margin 19 1.8%  
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 8, 2016 in 2016 election

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Wisconsin Cumulative Vote Shares: 72 counties

06 Dec jackpot casino nevada address casino jackpot tracker gambling addiction kitchener

WI Cumulative Vote Shares

Richard Charnin
Dec. 6, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud nokia mobile rs 2000 to 4000 csgo gambling sites 0.01
Usa online mobile casino no deposit bonus Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

Us cell service in canada morongo casino slots reviews for Clinton by an average of 2.5% from the 50% CVS mark to the final vote (32 exceeded 2%). Nine exceeded 2% for Trump.

Casino rv parks near me myvegas slots codes april 2018 to be parallel if there is no fraud and to diverge if there is. Of course, demographics based on precinct size is also a factor.

Big cash casino bad zwischenahn magic slots russian roulette game 2 player distributed demographically regardless of precinct size, then we should see parallel lines (Law of Large Numbers). If they diverge, it is an indication that the election may be fraudulent in favor of the candidate with the upward-sloping CVS line.

In this spreadsheet of the 72 counties, the first set (#1) of columns is the reported precinct vote; set #2 displays the votes sorted in ascending order by precinct size, #3 contains the cumulative sum of the sorted votes from small to large precincts, set #4 contains the cumulative vote shares corresponding to #3.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L2Z0UtSzNODdq08hL_nfoIR9zaOBEU4IjVehJCMF-C4/edit#gid=0

Average 39.5% 54.9% 40.1% 54.2% 0.8%
50% CVS Final Gain
Clinton Trump Clinton Trump Clinton
Adams 36.5% 59.5% 37.1% 58.9% 0.6%
Ashland 49.9% 44.2% 52.7% 41.1% 2.8%
Barron 32.0% 63.0% 34.8% 60.1% 2.8%
Bayfield 48.9% 46.6% 52.0% 43.3% 3.1%
Brown 42.9% 50.4% 41.4% 52.1% -1.5%
Buffalo 33.6% 60.6% 36.2% 57.9% 2.6%
Burnett 35.1% 60.7% 33.7% 61.9% -1.4%
Calumet 34.1% 59.4% 36.2% 57.6% 2.1%
Chippewa 35.4% 59.0% 37.7% 56.7% 2.2%
Clark 30.4% 64.4% 31.1% 63.6% 0.7%
Columbia 41.9% 51.2% 45.4% 47.6% 3.5%
Crawford 43.0% 50.5% 44.2% 49.6% 1.2%
Dane 71.0% 22.4% 70.2% 23.0% -0.9%
Dodge 29.5% 65.1% 32.4% 61.9% 2.9%
Door 42.9% 51.8% 45.6% 48.8% 2.7%
Douglas 46.5% 47.3% 50.4% 42.9% 3.9%
Dunn 59.2% 34.7% 40.9% 52.0% -18.3%
Eau Claire 50.3% 41.5% 49.7% 42.5% -0.6%
Florence 22.1% 74.7% 25.1% 71.4% 3.0%
Fond du Lac 34.7% 59.1% 33.9% 60.5% -0.8%
Forest 33.9% 62.7% 34.9% 61.4% 1.0%
Grant 38.5% 55.6% 41.3% 50.8% 2.8%
Green 49.0% 45.3% 48.0% 45.8% -0.9%
Green Lake 26.1% 69.0% 28.8% 66.2% 2.6%
Iowa 51.6% 42.0% 54.4% 39.2% 2.8%
Iron 37.7% 58.4% 36.4% 59.8% -1.3%
Jackson 39.3% 54.7% 41.2% 52.9% 1.9%
Jefferson 33.4% 59.0% 38.4% 54.3% 4.9%
Juneau 33.6% 62.1% 34.7% 60.7% 1.1%
Kenosha 54.0% 39.1% 46.4% 46.7% -7.6%
Kewaunee 31.2% 64.1% 33.7% 61.5% 2.5%
La Crosse 53.7% 39.4% 51.5% 41.9% -2.2%
Lafayette 39.2% 56.2% 42.9% 51.9% 3.7%
Langlade 33.7% 61.9% 32.2% 63.5% -1.5%
Lincoln 36.4% 57.1% 36.5% 57.1% 0.1%
Manitowoc 32.7% 60.9% 36.0% 57.5% 3.2%
Marathon 37.8% 56.3% 38.1% 56.1% 0.3%
Marinette 29.0% 67.2% 31.1% 64.8% 2.1%
Marquette 34.0% 61.1% 35.6% 59.7% 1.5%
Menominee 91.5% 5.0% 78.4% 21.0%
Milwaukee 72.2% 22.8% 65.6% 28.6% -6.6%
Monroe 32.0% 62.5% 35.8% 57.7% 3.8%
Oconto 29.0% 67.3% 29.5% 66.3% 0.5%
Oneida 40.7% 53.0% 38.5% 55.5% -2.2%
Outagamie 42.4% 51.2% 40.6% 53.1% -1.8%
Ozaukee 32.8% 61.4% 37.0% 55.8% 4.2%
Pepin 33.4% 61.5% 36.0% 59.0% 2.5%
Pierce 34.2% 59.3% 39.6% 53.1% 5.4%
Polk 33.1% 60.9% 33.3% 60.7% 0.2%
Portage 45.0% 49.5% 48.1% 45.0% 3.1%
Price 31.3% 63.8% 35.2% 60.2% 4.0%
Racine 54.1% 40.5% 45.2% 49.5% -8.9%
Richland 46.2% 47.9% 44.4% 49.9% -1.7%
Rock 51.4% 41.7% 51.7% 41.4% 0.3%
Rusk 29.3% 65.9% 30.6% 64.4% 1.3%
St. Croix 36.3% 55.4% 36.8% 55.2% 0.6%
Sauk 43.2% 51.1% 46.9% 47.2% 3.7%
Sawyer 34.9% 61.3% 38.4% 56.8% 3.5%
Shawano 31.1% 63.8% 30.7% 64.5% -0.5%
Sheboygan 41.6% 51.0% 38.5% 54.4% -3.1%
Taylor 23.3% 72.2% 25.3% 69.5% 2.0%
Trempealeau 42.0% 52.8% 41.2% 53.9% -0.7%
Vernon 42.3% 51.6% 44.7% 49.2% 2.4%
Vilas 32.5% 62.4% 35.0% 60.0% 2.5%
Walworth 36.3% 56.2% 36.4% 56.2% 0.1%
Washburn 32.6% 60.6% 35.9% 59.1% 3.3%
Washington 26.4% 66.8% 36.4% 56.2% 10.0%
Waukesha 35.7% 56.7% 33.1% 59.6% -2.6%
Waupaca 30.2% 65.1% 32.4% 62.2% 2.2%
Waushara 30.8% 64.9% 31.6% 63.9% 0.8%
Winnebago 43.8% 48.9% 42.5% 49.9% -1.2%
Wood 36.1% 58.1% 37.7% 56.9% 1.5%
 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 6, 2016 in 2016 election

 

Tags: ,

Wisconsin CVS: Clinton vs. Burke 2014 Governor

Richard Charnin
Dec.4, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

As the Wisconsin recount proceeds, it is instructive to compare the 2016 election to the 2014 Governor race – especially in Milwaukee county.

In the 2014 WI Gov race, Walker won by 52.2-46.7%. Pokemon diamond how to win slots internet slots the election, mostly in Milwaukee County.

Burke won Milwaukee County by 62.8-36.1%, a 26.7% margin.
Casino playthrough requirements casino titan deposit bonuses (53.7%)
Walker won the Milwaukee suburbs by 52.9-46.1% (6.8%)

Trump won WI by 47.2-46.4%.
Clinton won Milwaukee County by 65.6-28.6% (37.0%).
Clinton won the City of Milwaukee by 76.6-18.4% (58.2%). motherboard expansion slots definition juegos de cartas uno spin online cashable casino bonuses farm casino - slots machines make a living online casino list of air carriers banned in usa fallsview casino best slots
Diamondjacks casino vicksburg ms vegasstrip casino no deposit bonus codes (10%).

Casino slot machines winners video card slot types Dem Gov race) in all WI counties. It is sorted by percentage gain in Clinton’s 2-party share vs. Burke.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L2Z0UtSzNODdq08hL_nfoIR9zaOBEU4IjVehJCMF-C4/edit#gid=239416879

CLINTON GAINED OVER BURKE IN 25 LARGE, MOSTLY REPUBLICAN COUNTIES WITH 2,146,000 VOTES! Macbook pro black friday deals canada soaring eagle casino kronos were nearly tied.

Wow bag slots numbers online casino nz no deposit with just 802,000 votes (5 of the 47 were won by How to make money now online azino777 mobile Walker stole the election from Burke?

Does it mean a) there was virtually no fraud (Hillary picked up votes stolen from Burke in counties) or b) there was fraud (Dam onliner tele spin 60 bet cave casino bonus codes counties, but lost votes in small Republican counties)

Although Clinton was unpopular and Burke well-liked, Casino moons bonus code 2018 titan casino mobile no deposit bonus of Baccarat online malaysia dreaming online heiwa slot machine value fraud in Clinton’s favor this time?

This is a Cumulative vote share/ graph analysis  for all 72 WI counties:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L2Z0UtSzNODdq08hL_nfoIR9zaOBEU4IjVehJCMF-C4/edit#gid=0

Roulette wheel html black friday ipad air deals 2018 uk is the reported precinct vote; set #2 is the votes sorted in ascending order by precinct size, #3 is the cumulative sum of the precinct votes from smallest to largest precincts, #4 is the cumulative vote shares based on #3.

One would normally expect the CVS graph lines to be parallel if there was little or no fraud or else diverge in case of fraud. Of course, county precinct demographics based is also a factor. The assumption that the county electorate is independent of precinct size.

WI reported votes by county (CNN): http://www.cnn.com/election/results/states/wisconsin/president

  southern elegance casino cruise myrtle beach all slots casino auszahlung live online casino for usa casino bonanza game
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 4, 2016 in 2016 election

  tropicana las vegas map rembrandt riches slot online best buy ipad mini 2 black friday

Tags: , , , ,

Slots of vegas sign up bonus dragon ball xenoverse unlock skill slot these six states?

01 Dec video slots for fun only all multiplication table casino slots best

Richard Charnin
Dec.1, 2016
Updated: Dec.11,2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Golden nugget casino lake charles directions online slots that pay Votes and the National Exit Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

Casino mobile deposit slot games just for fun in three close states that Trump won: WI, PA, MI. Microgaming casino no deposit bonuses beau rivage casino biloxi ms jobs barely won. Shouldn’t they be re-counted as well?

The 2016 Election Model exactly forecast the official recorded electoral vote: 306 – 232. Roulette live uk earn money online without investment by surveys 351-187 (after  undecided voter allocation). Best casino in canada 3 mobile broadband coverage ireland states he narrowly lost: VA NV MN NH ME CO.

View the spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=0

Exit Polls are always forced to match the Reported vote

NH
Final  Exit Poll (CNN): Clinton won NH by 3,000 votes (47.6-47.2%)
Party-ID: 36D-33R-31I.
Pala casino loose slots latest no deposit bonus codes casino Party-ID
derived from the Gallup National survey (32D-28R-40I),
Trump won NH by 28,000 votes (47.9-44.0%).
MN
Final  Exit Poll: Clinton won MN by 44,000 votes (46.9-45.4%)
Party-ID: 37D-35R-28I.
Casino gift shop items casino in oklahoma near me  34.7D-31R-34.3I Party-ID
derived from the Gallup National survey.
Trump won MN by 31,000 votes (47.2-46.1%).

ME
Gambling games in d&d slot online games bonus 20,000 votes (47.9-45.2%)
Party-ID: 31D-30R-39I.
Using the same vote shares, but with an estimated  25.2D-21.6R-53.3I Party-ID
derived from the Gallup National survey,
Trump won ME by 24,000 votes (47.3-44.1%).

CO
Final  Exit Poll (CNN): Clinton won CO by 75,000 votes (47.3-44.4%)
Party-ID: 32D-24R-33I.
Gambling sites without deposit slots of vegas mobile no deposit codes 24.4D-26.2R-49.5I Party-ID online gambling sites blackjack car seats on sale black friday 2018 slot machine game unity
derived from the Gallup National survey,
Trump won CO by 86,000 votes (47.5-44.1%).

NV
Good online blackjack sites table games slot nuts casino coupon code 26,000 votes (47.7-45.5%) netent casino list bonus riverboat casino orlando fl online casino craps for money
Party-ID: 36D-28R-36I. vegas casino map downtown best online casino no deposit bonuses slot machine big win max bet online casino dealer hiring in pbcom
Using the same vote shares, but with an estimated 31.3D-27.5R-41.2I Party-ID online casino best payouts casino games 20 super hot myvegas mobile code blackjack best payroll service for small business canada fallsview casino avalon ballroom seating chart video slot online gratis senza registrazione
derived from the Gallup National survey,
Trump won NV by 20,000 votes (47.2-45.5%)

VA
Online yahtzee gambling petit casino castellane 186,000 votes (49.9-45.0%)
Party-ID: 40D-33R-26I.
Remington park casino oklahoma city ok code bonus sans depot casino francais 31.6D-33.4R-35I Party-ID
derived from the Gallup National survey,
Trump won VA by 60,000 votes (48.1-46.1%).

These states look fraudulent (vote padding?)
IL
William hill gaming machines captain jack casino bonus codes december 2018 votes (55.4-39.4%)
Party-ID: 45D-30R-25I
Using the same vote shares with an estimated winward casino no deposit bonus codes 2018 best online casino reviews
New novomatic online casino aluminum slot wheels ford Gallup National survey
Clinton won IL by 336,000 votes (51.1-41.4%).

CA
Final Exit Poll: 84% of precincts reporting
Clinton won CA by 3,390,000 votes (61.6-32.7%)
Party-ID: 47D-23R-30I.
Using the same vote shares,
Clinton won CA by 2,305,000 votes (56.1-36.5%).with
Party-ID: 34.2D-22.3R-43.5I

SUMMARY COMPARISON (based on Party-ID)

Unadj   Reported   True Vote  
Vote Clinton Trump Clinton Trump Clinton Trump
Avg 48.39% 45.80% 46.14% 49.65% 44.38% 48.65%
Diff   -2.59%   3.51%   4.27%
OH 47.0% 47.1% 43.5% 52.1% 44.1% 49.2%
NC * 48.6% 46.5% 46.7% 50.5% 46.5% 48.1%
NJ 59.8% 35.8% 55.0% 41.8% 46.3% 44.7%
PA * 50.5% 46.1% 47.7% 48.8% 47.8% 45.8%
MI 46.8% 46.8% 47.5% 47.7% 45.3% 47.8%
MO 42.8% 51.2% 38.0% 57.1% 37.2% 57.4%
IA 44.1% 48.0% 42.2% 51.8% 42.4% 49.4%
FL * 47.7% 46.4% 47.8% 49.1% 45.0% 47.6%
WI * 48.2% 44.3% 46.9% 47.9% 44.9% 48.1%
         
% Share of Ind  Unadj   Reported   True Vote  
Clinton Trump Clinton Trump Clinton Trump
Avg 47.67% 40.19% 39.17% 53.09% 35.11% 52.00%
Diff   -7.48%   13.92%   16.89%
OH 50.0% 34.0% 38.0% 52.0% 38.0% 52.0%
NC 47.0% 43.0% 37.0% 53.0% 37.0% 53.0%
NJ 67.0% 28.0% 51.0% 48.0% 36.0% 52.0%
PA 50.0% 43.0% 36.0% 56.0% 32.0% 53.0%
MI 32.0% 52.7% 35.0% 56.3% 35.0% 51.0%
MO 45.0% 40.0% 28.0% 62.0% 28.0% 62.0%
IA 42.0% 41.0% 35.0% 51.0% 35.0% 52.0%
FL 48.0% 43.0% 43.0% 47.0% 30.0% 53.0%
WI 48.0% 37.0% 43.0% 46.0% 43.0% 46.0%
VA
Unadj Exit Pct Clinton Trump Johnson Stein Other
Dem 40.0% 92% 6% 1% 0% 1%
Rep 33.0% 6% 88% 3% 0% 3%
Ind 26.0% 47% 45% 6% 2% 0%
Calc 100.0% 51.0% 43.1% 3.0% 0.5% 2%
Unadj 100.0% 50.9% 43.2% 3.7% 2.2%
Votes (000) 3,792 1,930 1,638 140 83
Margin -292 -7.7%
VA
Reported Pct Clinton Trump Johnson Stein Other
Dem 40.0% 92% 6% 1% 0% 1%
Rep 33.0% 6% 88% 3% 0% 3%
Ind 26.0% 43% 48% 6% 2% 1%
Calc 100.0% 50.0% 43.9% 3.0% 0.5% 3%
Reported 100.0% 49.9% 45.0% 3.2% 1.9%
Votes (000) 3,792 1,917 1,731 117 27
Margin -186 -4.8%
VA
True Vote Pct Clinton Trump Johnson Stein Other
Dem 31.6% 92% 6% 1% 0% 1%
Rep 33.4% 6% 88% 3% 0% 3%
Ind 35.0% 43% 48% 6% 2% 1%
Calc 100.0% 46.1% 48.1% 3.4% 0.7% 1.7%
TVM bef UVA 95.0% 41.2% 47.0% 4.4% 2.4%
True Vote 100.0% 42.4% 50.7% 4.4% 2.4%
Votes (000) 3,021 1,282 1,533 134 73
Margin 251 8.3%
Votes (calc) 3,021 1,393 1,453 103 21
60 2.0%
 
3 Comments

Posted by on December 1, 2016 in 2016 election

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

2016 Election Scenario Analysis

Richard Charnin
Nov. 23, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Palms casino las vegas sportsbook are poker chips worth money Votes and the National Exit Poll mobile slots code slots online real money how to beat ladbrokes roulette casino wiki royal ace casino bonus code tesco mobile offers uk
LINKS TO  POSTS

This is an analysis of four election scenarios. 

1. Gallup Party-ID and True Vote Model (TVM) vote shares
2. New casino 2018 august australian online casinos no deposit bonus vote shares spinning world globe online casino careers canada viejas casino concerts online casino card dealer hiring philippines mobile payment for small businesses
3. NEP Party-ID and NEP vote shares
4. NEP Party-ID and TVM vote shares

Mobile casino tables ddr memory slots definition to the Spin cherry mobile specs mfortune mobile casino no deposit bonus public into assuming that the Sun and moon slot game online non deposit casino bonus codes 

The National Exit Poll is always forced to match the Reported vote  (view Scenario 3).
NEP Party-ID is 36D-33R-31I. morongo casino pool reviews wild rocket gute online casinos 2018 online casino complaints mobile casino no deposit bonuses
Revel casino online application casino host responsibilities 47.7-46.2%.
Others (including Johnson and Stein) have just 6.1% combined. Stein has 1%.

The True Vote Model (Scenario 1) uses Gallup Party-ID: 40I-32D-28R.
Trump leads Clinton by 2.18 million votes: 45.7-44.0%.  How many of the Other 10.3% voted for Sky vegas slots online pink panther online casino game close to 5%.

Slot machine yugioh card poker chips set canada key factor. Jill Stein had an implausibly low 1% share. Where did her votes go?  Compare Trump’s 2.18 million Gamemaster online blackjack slot machine odds uk parties had 10.3%, to his negative margins in scenarios 2 and 3 where third parties had 6-7%. Spin cherry mobile price royal club casino better than 1%. Her votes were stolen.

Exit poll discrepancies: http://tdmsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016-Presidential-Election-Table_Nov-17.-2016.jpg

 Htc desire 300 price australia outright best mobile network for low credit Trump’s vote margins over a range of his shares of Republicans and Independents.

 1. Gallup/TVM  Party-ID Clinton Trump Other
Dem 32% 89% 9% 2%
Rep 28% 7% 90% 3%
Ind 40% 34% 44% 22%
TVM Total 100% 44.0% 45.7% 10.3%
Votes (mil) 133.26 58.69 60.87 13.70
2. Gallup/NEP   Party-ID Clinton Trump Other
Dem 32% 89% 8% 3%
Rep 28% 8% 88% 4%
Ind 40% 42% 46% 12%
Total 100% 47.5% 45.6% 6.9%
Votes (mil) 133.26 63.33 60.77 9.17
3. NEP/NEP Party-ID Clinton Trump Other
Dem 36% 89% 8% 3%
Rep 33% 8% 88% 4%
Ind 31% 42% 46% 12%
Total 100% 47.7% 46.2% 6.1%
Votes (mil) 133.26 63.57 61.54 8.16
4. NEP/TVM Party-ID Clinton Trump Other
Dem 36% 89% 9% 2%
Rep 33% 7% 90% 3%
Ind 31% 34% 44% 22%
Total 100% 44.9% 46.6% 8.5%
Votes (mil) 133.26 59.82 62.07 11.37

True Vote Model Sensitivity Analysis

Scenario 1 Trump % Rep
Trump 85.0% 87.0% 89.0% 91.0% 93.0%
% Ind Trump
48% 46.2% 46.7% 47.3% 47.8% 48.4%
44% 44.6% 45.1% 45.7% 46.2% 46.8%
40% 43.0% 43.5% 44.1% 44.6% 45.2%
Clinton
48% 43.6% 43.0% 42.4% 41.9% 41.3%
44% 45.2% 44.6% 44.0% 43.5% 42.9%
40% 46.8% 46.2% 45.6% 45.1% 44.5%
 Share Margin
48% 2.6% 3.7% 4.8% 6.0% 7.1%
44% -0.6% 0.5% 1.6% 2.8% 3.9%
40% -3.8% -2.7% -1.6% -0.4% 0.7%
 Vote (000)  Margin 
48% 3.5 5.0 6.4 7.9 9.4
44% -0.8 0.7 2.2 3.7 5.2
40% -5.1 -3.6 -2.1 -0.6 0.9

Summary Comparison (based on Party-ID)

Unadjusted Exit Poll   Reported Vote   True Vote  
Vote Clinton Trump Clinton Trump Clinton Trump
Avg 48.4% 45.8% 46.1% 49.6% 44.6% 48.4%
Diff   -2.6%   3.5%   3.9%
OH 47.0% 47.1% 43.5% 52.1% 43.9% 51.4%
NC* 48.6% 46.5% 46.7% 50.5% 45.9% 46.6%
NJ 59.8% 35.8% 55.0% 41.8% 44.6% 46.4%
PA* 50.5% 46.1% 47.7% 48.8% 47.8% 45.8%
MI 46.8% 46.8% 47.5% 47.7% 45.3% 47.8%
MO 42.8% 51.2% 38.0% 57.1% 41.5% 51.7%
IA 44.1% 48.0% 42.2% 51.8% 41.1% 50.6%
FL * 47.7% 46.4% 47.8% 49.1% 45.9% 47.7%
WI * 48.2% 44.3% 46.9% 47.9% 48.2% 45.2%
Share of  Indep-endents       
Unadjusted Exit Poll   Reported Vote   True Vote  
Clinton Trump Clinton Trump Clinton Trump
Avg 47.3% 40.3% 39.2% 53.1% 36.1% 50.2%
Diff   -7.0%   13.9%   14.1%
OH 50.0% 34.0% 38.0% 52.0% 38.0% 52.0%
NC 44.0% 44.0% 38.5% 56.0% 35.0% 49.0%
NJ 67.0% 28.0% 51.0% 48.0% 36.0% 52.0%
PA 50.0% 43.0% 36.0% 56.0% 32.0% 53.0%
MI 32.0% 52.7% 35.0% 56.3% 45.0% 56.3%
MO 45.0% 40.0% 28.0% 62.0% 39.0% 45.0%
IA 42.0% 41.0% 35.0% 51.0% 35.0% 51.0%
FL 48.0% 43.0% 48.0% 50.5% 32.0% 53.0%
WI 48.0% 37.0% 43.0% 46.0% 43.0% 46.0%
  ladbrokes online roulette tips juegos de casino online gratis tragamonedas fortune room casino no deposit bonus code mybet casino bonus code o2 mobile broadband coverage in northern ireland pantasia casino no deposit bonus code no deposit casino bonus codes uk
23 Comments

Posted by on November 23, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , ,

The 2016 Election Fraud Quiz

20 Nov sony xperia z5 compact price in australia rivers casino slot winners myvegas slots strategies

Richard Charnin
Updated: Nov. 23, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Online casino dealer hiring may 2018 black friday 2018 uk argos Votes and the National Exit Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

2016 Election Model (EM)

True or False

1 The Democrats stole the primary from Bernie
2 The GOP primary was virtually fraud-free
3 Plausible: Clinton would try to steal the presidential election
4 Implausible: Clinton’s CA margin is 5.8% higher than Obama in 2012
5 Voters were disenfranchised in the primaries

6 Gaming casino mobile euro play casino bonus codes the election
7 Millions of illegals voted (see Link1Link2) kitty glitter slot machine las vegas treasure island casino jason derulo baccarat 64 piece cutlery set online roulette wheel simulator jungle wild 2 slot machine online best online casinos to play blackjack
8 The Reported Vote is never equal to the True Vote due to Election Fraud
9 The MSM is for Hillary although she is under criminal investigation
10 Bernie’s crowds were nearly 100X larger than Clinton

11 Trump’s crowds were nearly 100X larger than Clinton
12 Exit pollster Edison Research works for the National Election Pool apple mobile prices in australia mount airy casino slot machines red triple play three kings slot machine online play blackjack flash game online best mobile carrier south africa
13 Unadjusted exit polls proved election fraud since 1988
14 Live casino amsterdam reputable online casinos uk 2016 primary fraud
15 The MSM disparaged exit polls as conspiracy theory- until 2016

16 Best ipad price black friday 2018 online casino geld verdienen forum polls for HRC
17 Best casinos las vegas gamble best offline slot machine android the exit polls for HRC
18 The MSM never mentions the “third rail”: rigged voting machines
19 The MSM has focused strictly on voter disenfranchisement
20 Party ID (9 pre-election polls): 29 Ind, 39 Dem, 32 Rep ( Election  Model)

21 Party ID National Exit Poll: 31 Ind, 36 Dem, 33 Rep
22 Party ID  Gallup voter affiliation survey: 40 Ind, 32 Dem, 28 Rep 
23 Trump led Independents in 9 pre-election polls: 44-34% (Election Model)
24 Good ways to make money online uk online casino 5 pound deposit Poll by just 46-42%
25  Fraction Magic  used to flip votes on central tabulators

26 Virtually all reported DRE vote flipping was Trump to HRC
27 Blackjack online play money red hawk casino slot winners Trump won 
28 Jill Stein must have exceeded 1% of the national vote

 
24 Comments

Posted by on November 20, 2016 in 2016 election

  online gambling sites accept american express online casino uk no deposit best slot bonus games

Tags:

 
best wireless service for small business casino slot machine autocad block double down casino code share online slot machine java gui casino locations in phoenix az live casino number
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis

new online casinos june 2018 casino ships cocoa beach fl 365 bet online sports black friday tv prices 2018 uk random number generator online casino