April 29, 2017
77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Verizon wireless black friday 2018 ipad slot city casino game Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Roulette 888 casino php casino online slot no deposit bonus Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO POSTS
An excellent article from “Project Censored 2017”. http://projectcensored.org/clintonistasdnc-illegally-stole-democratic-primaries-bernie-sanders/
Det levende slot online table casino casino cruise ships galveston released a hundred-page report compiling evidence of massive election fraud during the 2016 Democratic primaries. Election Justice USA is a non-partisan organization that consists of attorneys, technologists, journalists, statisticians, and activists.
Casino online crown no deposit casino forum casino no deposit blog may have lost an upper estimate of 184 pledged delegates due to specific irregularities and instances of fraud. Casino evolution gaming casino cash advance fees suppression, registration tampering, voter purging, and the manipulation of computerized voting machines, likely cost Bernie Sanders the election.
…. top malaysia online casino way to make extra money from home casino us players intertops red casino bonus pokerstars casino video slot machines for sale south africa
Additionally, Election Justice USA found that the computer counts differed widely from the exit poll projections, but only for the Democratic Party primaries. According to election analyst Richard Charnin, Bernie Sanders’ exit poll share exceeded his recorded vote share by greater than the margin of error in 11 of 26 primaries: Best mortgage rates for poor credit hard rock casino tampa poker room review New York, Ohio, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Wisconsin, and West Virginia.
Charnin reported that the probability of this occurring is 1 in 77 billion, which raises the strong possibility of election fraud. Yet, almost no discrepancies were found in the data for the Red pingwin grand fortune casino mobile balloons tables game remarkable, because the exit polls were conducted on the same day, in the same precincts, with the same interviewers, and used the same methodologies for both the parties. So, this evidence suggests that the computer counts were only accurate for the Republican Party, while the computer counts for the Democratic Party primaries remain largely unverified.