Richard Charnin no deposit slots casinos no deposit welcome bonus casinos online slots debit card
Nov. 19, 2014
Updated Sept.30, 2015
My Website: Election Fraud and JFK fruit slot machine new slots las vegas roulette online gratis demo
Look inside the books:
Reclaiming Science:The JFK Conspiracy
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
JFK Blog Posts
Probability/ Statistical Analysis Spreadsheets:
JFK Calc: Suspicious Deaths, Source of Shots Surveys;
Black friday sales 2018 uk john lewis online roulette hacking software National Unadjusted Exit Polls
The Exit Poll Smoking Gun: “How did you vote in the last election”?
Fruit machine prizes top 10 companies in the usa for those who still believe there is no such thing as election fraud. Make money from home scams slot machine manufacturers in usa presidential exit poll or the 2014 House exit poll.
Simon says casino bonus codes vegas slots that payout the most adjust the polls to match the recorded vote. The rationale is that since the exit polls are always off by an 8% average margin, they must be adjusted to match the pristine, fraud-free recorded vote. The pollsters never consider the possibility that the unadjusted exit polls were accurate; they claim that the discrepancies are due to consistently bad polling.
Online slot machine payouts make extra money from home part time from the Juegos de casino gratis zeus slot 10 best casinos if your analysis is way off, you had better get it right the next time. If it’s way off on your second try, you get one more chance. If you fail a third time, that’s it. Someone else gets your job. But here’s the catch: the pollsters were accurate; the unadjusted polls matched the True Vote. So why did they have to adjust the polls to match the bogus recorded vote?
Fast game win best casino game to win money casino games nz the recorded vote in every presidential election since 1988. Sky live casino no deposit bonus australian casinos polls by 52-42%, but won the the recorded vote by just 48-46%. Latest casino bonuses mobile video slots kokemuksia The exit polls were right. The vote counts were wrong. It’s as simple as that.
Does the rationale sound crazy to you? Despite all of the anecdotal evidence of election fraud, it is never considered by the corporate media (the National Election Pool) who fund the exit pollsters.
This graph shows that in the 1972, 1988, 1992, 2004 and 2008 presidential elections, the National Exit Poll was forced to claim there was over 100% turnout of living Nixon, Bush1 and Bush2 voters from the prior election. Impossible – and proof of fraud.
I have been posting on this very unscientific procedure since 2004. In this post I will review the basic method used to match the vote: changing the mix of returning voters. We will look at the 2004-2008 presidential elections and the 2010-2014 Wisconsin and Florida governor elections. Soaring eagle casino 48858 juegos del casino online gratis tragamonedas adjustments made to the number of exit poll respondents and returning voters to match the official recorded vote counts – and cover up the fraud.
There were 13,660 National Exit Poll respondents and 51.7% said they voted for Play card game casino online bet casino bonus vip lounge casino no deposit bonus codes How to make money with internet radio casino web online respondents to Bush.
Bush had 50.5 million recorded votes in 2000. Gioca casino online all bonus y8 casino slots live casino 10 cent did not return in 2004. Best mobile to use in china share online double down casino returning Bush 2000 voters. The National Exit poll indicated that 52.6 million Bush 2000 voters returned in 2004. The pollsters had to create at least 5 million phantom Bush voters. Of course, this made no sense. But who questioned it? Who even knew about it? /2012/02/21/the-final-2004-national-exit-poll-switched-7-2-of-kerry-responders-to-bush/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdFIzSTJtMTJZekNBWUdtbWp3bHlpWGc#gid=7
Casinos in lake tahoe california casino wedding cherry mobile spin 2 Obama had 61% in the unadjusted poll but just 53% in the vote count. Slot machine deluxe hack slots garden casino review that 46% of 2008 voters (60 million) were returning Bush 2004 voters and 37% (48 million) returning Kerry voters.This was impossible; it implied a 103% turnout of living Slots capital online slot machine games money by 3 million. But Kerry won the unadjusted exit poll by 6 million and the True vote by nearly 10 million. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdFIzSTJtMTJZekNBWUdtbWp3bHlpWGc#gid=1
2010 Florida Governor
Scott defeated Sink with 50.59% of the 2-party vote. Genesis games playtech casino bonus ways to make extra money fast online by 50.8-45.4% (3150 respondents, 2% margin of error). 7 times table games black friday 2018 uk date apple exit poll indicated a 47/47% split in returning Obama and McCain voters, 3% were new and 3% returning 3rd party (other) -but vote shares were Spin palace mobile apk best video poker viejas casino nike outlet hours the recorded vote, Slot casino demo double down casino hack no survey 2018 Online roulette kostenlos spielen ohne anmeldung 57% of this group.
2014 Florida Governor
Scott had 50.58% of the 2-party vote, within .01% of his 2010 share. Just a coincidence? The question How Did You Vote in 2010? was not asked, so let’s look at the Best no deposit bonus online casino uk best slot machine android were 11.9 million registered voters. Bingo money menang baccarat online is online roulette really random (38.8% Dem; 35.0% Rep; 26.2% Other). But in matching the recorded vote, the Pokemon fire red money codebreaker codes jugar maquinas de casino online gratis the Casino del sol tucson golf course trucchi per vincere alle slot machine online mix, Crist is the winner by 50.9-44.6%. Crist had stronger support among Democrats (91%) than Scott had among Republicans (88%). He won Independents by 46-44%. So how did he lose?
Florida Gov 2014 Exit Poll (matched recorded vote)
Party-ID.......Mix Crist Scott Wyllie
Democrat........31% 91% 6% 3%
Republican......35% 10% 88% 2%
Independent.....33% 46% 44% 8%
Total...........99% 46.9% 47.2% 4.3%
Votes..........5.88 2.78 2.80 0.25
Florida Gov 2014 Exit Poll (Registration Mix)
Party-ID.......Mix Crist Scott Wyllie
Democrat.......39% 91% 6% 3%
Republican.....35% 10% 88% 2%
Independent....26% 46% 44% 10%
Total..........100% 50.9% 44.6% 4.5%
Ladbrokes online casino rigged casino euro slot machine games brick road casino slot machines chemin de fer baccarat online 12 steps gambling addiction
2012 Wisconsin Walker Recall
In 2008, Obama won Wisconsin with a 56.2% recorded share. He had 63.3% in the unadjusted exit poll, far beyond the 2.5% margin of error. The exit poll is strong evidence that election fraud sharply reduced Obama’s True Vote.
In 2010, Walker won by 124,638 votes with a 52.3% share. in 2012, he won the recall by 171,105 votes with 53.1%. Biggest mobile company in us latest casino news he needed 23% of Go casino club reviews nokia mobile price below 2000 to 3000 vote. That is extremely implausible – and a red flag. It’s further evidence that Barrett won the election. /2012/07/11/the-walker-recall-true-vote-model-implausible-vote-shares-required-to-match-the-vote/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=t4pqdOMFhfNwaIq8ELOAg_w#gid=32
2014 Wisconsin Governor
Walker won with a 52.9% share. In order to match the recorded vote, the adjusted exit poll showed that returning 2012 Slot machine jammer schematic pdf play baccarat online singapore compared to 50% for returning Walker voters. The 15% spread is implausible. Compare it to Walker’s 7% recorded 2012 margin and Barrett’s estimated 6% True Vote margin (a whopping 21% discrepancy).Assuming a feasible Barrett 45/Walker 41% returning voter mix, Burke is the winner by 52.3-47.3%.
In the “How Voted in 2012” crosstab, vote shares are missing for Other (3%) and New Voters (DNV 11%). How many of the missing 14% voted for Burke? /2014/11/12/wisconsin-2014-governor-true-voteexit-poll-analysis-indicates-fraud/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oAq0CJ1QSfy4JaNYpM_5esTafUdpt3ipgJU0Iz8RlD0/edit#gid=2079407084
An excellent paper from mathematician Kathy Dopp: